We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the Dankuk and Istalia Military and Tade Agreement
Details
Submitted by[?]: Fronte Democratico - P.L.
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 4373
Description[?]:
| This bill asks for the ratification of the Dankuk and Istalia Military and Tade Agreement. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the Dankuk and Istalia Military and Tade Agreement.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:11:58, April 02, 2018 CET | From | Partito dell'Unità Popolare-c.p.d. | To | Debating the Ratification of the Dankuk and Istalia Military and Tade Agreement |
| Message | We will not support. I will point out that according to the Zardic Institute of Economic Relations (http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=7637), we are a great power in military and economy, while they are a middle power. We should be in a parental status with them, not in an equal status. Perhaps we should found a military alliance with ourselves at its head to restore ourselves to our rightful place on the international stage. |
| Date | 21:19:59, April 02, 2018 CET | From | PRO - Cittadini Progressisti | To | Debating the Ratification of the Dankuk and Istalia Military and Tade Agreement |
| Message | Great! yet another treaty that allows other nations to take away all Istalia's military resources! |
| Date | 02:49:18, April 03, 2018 CET | From | Hwanghu Dang Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Dankuk and Istalia Military and Tade Agreement |
| Message | Hello I am from Dankuk we’re we have already ratified this treaty I encourage you all to do the same so that Dankuk and Istalia can assist one another Some of you complain that this treats us as equals What would you prefer? For us to be a puppet state of Istalia? This treaty is fair for both Istalia and Dankuk |
| Date | 20:02:23, April 03, 2018 CET | From | Fronte Democratico - P.L. | To | Debating the Ratification of the Dankuk and Istalia Military and Tade Agreement |
| Message | Lucio Vero Rosso, outgoing Minister of Foreign Affairs Mr.Speaker, The agreement that we intend to ratify will bring economic benefits because it favors the trade between Dankuk and Istalia trade that will have the cooperation between our countries for the development of an even better economy. On the military side, Istalia will be able to install bases freely in Dankuk as they can and will be an enriching experience for our Army. |
| Date | 20:25:58, April 03, 2018 CET | From | Partito dell'Unità Popolare-c.p.d. | To | Debating the Ratification of the Dankuk and Istalia Military and Tade Agreement |
| Message | Minister Rosso, I have been in collaboration with representatives for Dankuk, and they have agreed to the following alterations: To allow Istalia to be the only nation to import certain items to Dankuk, for our military to train their's, and for them to invest in our investment fund. Please get a new treaty that takes these into acount. |
| Date | 20:50:27, April 03, 2018 CET | From | Alleanza Radicale - NCD | To | Debating the Ratification of the Dankuk and Istalia Military and Tade Agreement |
| Message | Maria Donati, Whip of the Chamber: "Mr Speaker, We plaud the initiative of PUP, maybe more transparency would be appreciated... But we are sure you had the best intentions and we will be very glad to vote for the new treaty. However, we would like open a debate on the investments in our sovereign fund. The Strategic Fund was established to invest abroad. There are no provisions about investements in the Fund. In effect, the establishing law clearly states that the Minister of Finance, the Government is the owner. There are no authorization to trade our Fund and sell shares. And we have also to express our concern about recent offers. We should debate very well this matter." |
| Date | 20:55:29, April 03, 2018 CET | From | Partito Nazionale Democratico | To | Debating the Ratification of the Dankuk and Istalia Military and Tade Agreement |
| Message | Aurora Adorinda, AI Leader, If the PUP's claims are true, then we will vote against this bill. |
| Date | 21:25:49, April 03, 2018 CET | From | Partito dell'Unità Popolare-c.p.d. | To | Debating the Ratification of the Dankuk and Istalia Military and Tade Agreement |
| Message | Mrs. Donati, Do you not want other countries to invest in us? If this is the case, I find it disgraceful. Senator Tino Bertolini |
| Date | 21:34:47, April 03, 2018 CET | From | Hwanghu Dang Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Dankuk and Istalia Military and Tade Agreement |
| Message | Indeed it is true that the discussions the PUP had established these terms he claimed above |
| Date | 21:55:13, April 03, 2018 CET | From | Alleanza Radicale - NCD | To | Debating the Ratification of the Dankuk and Istalia Military and Tade Agreement |
| Message | Giorgia Ciriello, Spokeperson of AR: "Mr Speaker, Let me responde to Hon. Bertolini (OOC: which should be a deputy, the treaties are voted and approved by the Chamber). We indeed promote free trade and no limit to the investment. But we are talking about the investment fund of the State, of the Istalian Republic. Our Fund should invest massively in other countries. We can allow to the FSII to eatablish common initiative with other similar sovereign funds, but we have to maintain the the control of the revenue of this fund. Maybe a fixed minority shares to be reserved to third sovereign funds, but the first resource is istalian money, and the revenue of the FSII shall return to istalia and its people! Strange... Strange to feel myself as the most nationalistic exponent of this parliament..." |
| Date | 22:05:47, April 03, 2018 CET | From | Partito dell'Unità Popolare-c.p.d. | To | Debating the Ratification of the Dankuk and Istalia Military and Tade Agreement |
| Message | OOC: Sorry about using bertolini. Probably should have used someone else. Let's just say he was acting as a debater for the PUP on this issue. |
| Date | 14:32:59, April 04, 2018 CET | From | Conservative Party (보수당) | To | Debating the Ratification of the Dankuk and Istalia Military and Tade Agreement |
| Message | Dear Parties of Istalia, Dankuk will be very willing to adapt a new treaty to include more wants and desire from your country that benefits us both The treaty was not meant to be seen as evil or malicious but in fact a way that we can both support eachother and strengthen eachother militaries and economies We look forward to hearing your requests David Evans Minister of Foreign Affairs of Dankuk |
| Date | 23:51:21, April 04, 2018 CET | From | PRO - Cittadini Progressisti | To | Debating the Ratification of the Dankuk and Istalia Military and Tade Agreement |
| Message | The LdC would like to see a 'lighter'' version of this bill, with sole economic focus and thus no military agreements. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 114 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 283 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 108 |
| Random fact: In cases where players introduce RP laws to a nation and then leave, Moderation reserves the discretion to declare the RP laws void if they appear to have fallen into disuse. In particular, please bear in mind that a player who is inexperienced with Particracy role-play and has joined a nation as the only party there should not generally be expected to abide by RP laws implemented by previous players who have been and left. |
| Random quote: "Ask the experimenters why they experiment on animals, and the answer is: "Because the animals are like us." Ask the experimenters why it is morally okay to experiment on animals, and the answer is: "Because the animals are not like us." Animal experimentation rests on a logical contradiction." - Charles R. Magel |