We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Wild Animal Ownership Proposal
Details
Submitted by[?]: We Say So! Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2198
Description[?]:
| Understanding the dangers inherent in the ownership and containment of wild animals and accepting the problems of possible escape of aforementioned animals, the Government will henceforth ban the ownership of wild animals by private individuals on grounds of public safety. Zoological institutions may still own and care for wild animals provided high quality security measures are in place at all times and adequate space is provided for the care of aforementioned animals. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding the keeping of wild animals as pets.
Old value:: Wild animals may be kept as pets; the owners of dangerous wild animals must take the necessary measures to ensure they can't escape.
Current: The ownership of wild animals as pets is banned.
Proposed: The ownership of wild animals as pets is banned.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:57:40, March 07, 2006 CET | From |  Fascism Now! Party | To | Debating the Wild Animal Ownership Proposal |
| Message | Agreed. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 140 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 260 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Cabinet ministers who disagree seriously with the head of government would usually be expected to resign. Parties within the cabinet may attempt to manoeuvre to replace the head of government though, for example by proposing a new cabinet bill or voting for an early election. |
| Random quote: "The state is nothing but an instrument of oppression of one class by another, no less so in a democratic republic than in a monarchy." - John Smith |