Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 01:05:03
Server time: 18:54:56, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Mindus | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: TOP SECRET:Discussing Klavian Annexation

Details

Submitted by[?]: Hwanghu Dang Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 4396

Description[?]:

Currently my party has been discussing about Klavian annexation and how we could possibly annex them

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:17:59, April 29, 2018 CET
FromConservative Party (보수당)
ToDebating the TOP SECRET:Discussing Klavian Annexation
MessageDear Speaker

We will never support this. We have always said we will support every countries independence and this goes against it. Klavia are close allies and this would be disrespect. We will happily support klavian forces if you went ahaead with this malicious deed

Jacob Rhee
Shadow minister of defence

Date22:20:34, April 29, 2018 CET
FromHwanghu Dang Party
ToDebating the TOP SECRET:Discussing Klavian Annexation
MessageKlavia has multiple times disrespected Dankuk and the empress
They have broken there treaty with us and have left our treaties
They have said our empress is worse than there’s
They have disrespected us for the last time
Also if you wish to do a civil war we will crush you utterly

Date22:20:35, April 29, 2018 CET
FromHwanghu Dang Party
ToDebating the TOP SECRET:Discussing Klavian Annexation
MessageKlavia has multiple times disrespected Dankuk and the empress
They have broken there treaty with us and have left our treaties
They have said our empress is worse than there’s
They have disrespected us for the last time
Also if you wish to do a civil war we will crush you utterly

Date22:24:30, April 29, 2018 CET
FromConservative Party (보수당)
ToDebating the TOP SECRET:Discussing Klavian Annexation
MessageDear Speaker,

We are not asking for war. We are asking that you reconsider your thoughts. As your party holds the foreign ministry we would like you to negotiate some deal with them. They have done nothing wrong in recent years. In fact when you were in klavia, you broke all ties with us

We should keep peace with them for now there is no reason to invade

Jacob Rhee
Shadow Minister of defence

Date22:24:30, April 29, 2018 CET
FromConservative Party (보수당)
ToDebating the TOP SECRET:Discussing Klavian Annexation
MessageDear Speaker,

We are not asking for war. We are asking that you reconsider your thoughts. As your party holds the foreign ministry we would like you to negotiate some deal with them. They have done nothing wrong in recent years. In fact when you were in klavia, you broke all ties with us

We should keep peace with them for now there is no reason to invade

Jacob Rhee
Shadow Minister of defence

Date22:26:54, April 29, 2018 CET
FromHwanghu Dang Party
ToDebating the TOP SECRET:Discussing Klavian Annexation
MessageWe don’t wish for war either
If we can annex them peacefully we would however they have insulted our people and have insulted our empress
If they continue with these attitudes then we will destroy and annex them
OOC:Yo why you mentioning previous parties?

Date22:31:24, April 29, 2018 CET
FromConservative Party (보수당)
ToDebating the TOP SECRET:Discussing Klavian Annexation
MessageDear Speaker,

That is not how democracy works. It’s funny that your party withdrew the Lese Majeste law and now getting upset when people criticise the empress. The empress is kind and respectful and finds this all rather humourous

We should not annex them

Jacob Rhee
Shadow minister of defence

Date22:35:20, April 29, 2018 CET
FromHwanghu Dang Party
ToDebating the TOP SECRET:Discussing Klavian Annexation
MessageDear CP,

They have continually disrespected our nation,people,and monarchy. They continue to disrespect us and our people. There are also rumors they may be allowing Kazulia to store nuclear weapons on there soil. We can never be safe if this is true.

We must annex Klavia

Date22:39:12, April 29, 2018 CET
FromConservative Party (보수당)
ToDebating the TOP SECRET:Discussing Klavian Annexation
MessageDear Speaker,

Klavia are very small and far away why should we have interests in annexation?

You say they are disrespectful but why did you remove the Lese majeste law which enforced punishments against this. Now the law has gone it makes things harder to deal with

Your party is just thirsty for power and are very greedy

They may say bad stuff but it’s not a good enough reason to annex them. We have many allies against Kazulia so the threat is not as big anymore

Jacob Rhee
Shadow minister of defence

Date22:42:10, April 29, 2018 CET
FromHwanghu Dang Party
ToDebating the TOP SECRET:Discussing Klavian Annexation
MessageNuclear weapons near us and our allies is a threat
We have several naval bases near Klavia and if they were to be struck our navy would be severally damaged
I say we act in the name of the security council and liberate the people

Date22:45:02, April 29, 2018 CET
FromConservative Party (보수당)
ToDebating the TOP SECRET:Discussing Klavian Annexation
MessageDear Speaker,

We believe an investigation should take place

Klavia are not strong enough to act on their own so the amount of damage is not likely to be high

Jacob Rhee
Shadow minister of defence

Date22:50:41, April 29, 2018 CET
FromHwanghu Dang Party
ToDebating the TOP SECRET:Discussing Klavian Annexation
MessageEven 1 nuclear strike on our naval yards could damage them enough for Kazulia to attack and conquer Dankuk
We will be happy to initiate any investigation into the nuclear weapons of Klavia

Date22:54:00, April 29, 2018 CET
FromSunrise Party 해돋이당
ToDebating the TOP SECRET:Discussing Klavian Annexation
MessageDear parties,

Order please. Now, our country has had interests in Klavia for years, it is prime vacation reality. It also sits on major tradeways so land is valuable. Unfortunately a new party has commandeered their government. However, they aren't the only faction there-there is a Hosian party there that I've been in communication with and they seem friendly. Perhaps we don't need to use force in this affair. While I firmly believe in national sovereignty, I also am not opposed to annexation of them, provided they have a lot of autonomy. Annexation in my party's view could be beneficial to Klavia in that it allows more freedom of movement between our two countries. Annexation should be done as a vote by people of Klavia and ourselves. Yes vote means they become part of the empire, including all privileges. The nuclear rumor is also very concerning. If we try to force the issue though it might hurt our alliances, make it harder to hold the island nation, and destroy what value can be gained in this endeavor. I suggest some pause and thought first.

Prince Tae Kyo
Yeonguijeong

Date23:00:35, April 29, 2018 CET
FromHwanghu Dang Party
ToDebating the TOP SECRET:Discussing Klavian Annexation
MessageWe agree with Prince Tae Kyo
We shall wait and discuss annexation of Klavia
If they don’t like annexation perhaps they can become a commonwealth of Dankuk

Date17:44:17, April 30, 2018 CET
FromConservative Party (보수당)
ToDebating the TOP SECRET:Discussing Klavian Annexation
MessageDear Parties,

If they want to join us they can be we will vote against any forced type of annexation. They deserve a join on what happens to their nation

Jacob Rhee
Shadow Minister of Defence

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes

    Total Seats: 0

    no
     

    Total Seats: 92

    abstain
      

    Total Seats: 163


    Random fact: Periodically, it is a good idea to go through your nation's Treaties and arrange to withdraw from any that are unwanted.

    Random quote: "The Lord is a man of war" - Exodus 15:3

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 61