Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5475
Next month in: 03:50:11
Server time: 20:09:48, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (5): hexaus19 | LC73DunMHP | luthorian3059 | Paulo Nogueira | wstodden2 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Unrestrained Defence Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Beluzian Conservative Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 4393

Description[?]:

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:59:31, May 14, 2018 CET
FromUnited Front of Beluzia
ToDebating the Unrestrained Defence Bill
MessageBiological, Chemical and Nuclear weapons put innocent civilians at serious risk aswell as the use of Land Mines. All wars should be fought with situation ethics in mind, and the protection of innocent civilians such be our number one priority. To me, the proposals don't agree with that in the slightest. I urge all to vote no

Date00:50:54, May 15, 2018 CET
FromBeluzian Conservative Party
ToDebating the Unrestrained Defence Bill
Message"wars should be fought with situation ethics" has to be the most comical quote made in this legislature during the past 100 years.

Date08:52:13, May 15, 2018 CET
FromUnited Front of Beluzia
ToDebating the Unrestrained Defence Bill
MessageComical isn't quite the term. Civilian Casualties should forever be our number one priority if war is to arise and having the proposed options open is allowing for a more dangerous route.

Date08:52:24, May 15, 2018 CET
FromUnited Front of Beluzia
ToDebating the Unrestrained Defence Bill
MessageComical isn't quite the term. Civilian Casualties should forever be our number one priority if war is to arise and having the proposed options open is allowing for a more dangerous route.

Date17:29:02, May 15, 2018 CET
FromLiberty Party
ToDebating the Unrestrained Defence Bill
MessageI agree with these propositions. Although Liberty supported the implementation of article 1 previously we have come to realize that if a nation uses nuclear weapons against Beluzia first the war has reached irreconcilable and devastating proportions and whatever we retaliate with will be merely an attempt to take them down with us. By maintaining an "any time" capability we make our opponents aware that their cities may be reduced to ash first and without warning leveling the playing field considerably. Liberty earnestly hope that it never comes to that and that Beluzia maintain peaceful relations with all people on Terra.

Date18:05:32, May 15, 2018 CET
FromLiberty Party
ToDebating the Unrestrained Defence Bill
Messagecorrection: "...implementation of [a version of] article 1 [with regards to the nuclear capability bill since changed to a policy of "last resort"]...."

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 545

no
  

Total Seats: 205

abstain
   

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Information about the population of each country can be found on the Population Information thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=8663

Random quote: "You cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themselves." - Abraham Lincoln

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 67