We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Domestic Security Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Beluzian Conservative Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 4401
Description[?]:
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The confidentiality of letters and correspondence.
Old value:: The confidentiality of letters is inviolable.
Current: The confidentiality of letters is inviolable, but the justice dept. can violate it in extreme situations.
Proposed: The confidentiality of letters is inviolable, but the justice dept. can violate the confidentiality of letters with grounded cause.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Freedom of information law.
Old value:: Classified files are released after a set period of time provided doing so is not deemed to endanger national security.
Current: Classified files are released after a set period of time provided doing so is not deemed to endanger national security.
Proposed: Classified files are released after a set period of time provided doing so is not deemed to be against the public interest.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Police searches.
Old value:: The police cannot search a person or their property without their consent unless the police have obtained a warrant from a court or in cases of imminent danger.
Current: The police cannot search a person or their property without their consent unless the police have obtained a warrant from a court.
Proposed: The police cannot search a person or their property without their consent unless the police have obtained a warrant from a court or have reasonable grounds to suspect that a crime was committed.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:48:04, May 29, 2018 CET | From | Beluzian Party | To | Debating the Domestic Security Bill |
| Message | We oppose this bill, it violates civil rights. |
| Date | 03:13:03, May 30, 2018 CET | From | United Socialist Party | To | Debating the Domestic Security Bill |
| Message | The United Socialist Party does not believe that searches should be commenced on grounds as loose as "Reasonable Suspicion." That being said, we do happen to support Article 1 as the justice dept. should be allowed to violate the confidentiality of letters in the name of bringing justice. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 431 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 319 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Party candidates for head of state elections are not visible to the public. This means that you cannot see who will run and who will not, which adds another strategic element to the elections. |
| Random quote: "When anger rises, think of the consequences." - Confucius |