We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: RP:Parliamentary Procedure Debate
Details
Submitted by[?]: Isràkifrndélyk Prta
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 4406
Description[?]:
| this is a debate on the parliamentary procedures that should be written down to avoid chaos and confusion. I care about the compromise between parties in this matter. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 20:18:48, May 31, 2018 CET | From | Zhtál-Merlkai Tjarziprta | To | Debating the RP:Parliamentary Procedure Debate |
| Message | Mr Speaker, I will say this to the honourable gentleman from the Communist Party. I am all for avoiding chaos and confusion, but is he? If so I ask him to consider the following compromises: 1) If a bill is rejected by the Grand Council, the same party who proposed it should not entertain proposing it again until there has been a change to the Grand Council makeup I.e. an election has been held, or a party has dropped out of the Grand Council. Otherwise it is a pointless exercise that simply, as my grandson would put it, spams the system. 2) Early elections are only called for if there is clear justification. For example, there is a loss in confidence in the government by the majority of Grand Council Members, a scandal has been exposed which should force an election or a party drops out of the Grand Council leaving seats to be filled. We hope to see some common ground on these reasonable suggestions. Duke Sígzma Barnkuksrmko Zhtál Prefect of the Grand Council |
| Date | 10:56:41, June 01, 2018 CET | From | Isràkifrndélyk Prta | To | Debating the RP:Parliamentary Procedure Debate |
| Message | both proposals limit the rights of the opposition, so we can not agree to them. |
| Date | 22:47:21, June 01, 2018 CET | From |   Knstat Nrzilyk Kmitat | To | Debating the RP:Parliamentary Procedure Debate |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, The proposals put forward by the Prefect are incredibly reasonable. That the communists can not even agree to not spamming the Grand Council with the same ridiculous policies over and over says enough. We will not vote favourable on any of their proposals regarding this issue. Duchess Mri Anzlék |
| Date | 11:17:57, June 02, 2018 CET | From | Isràkifrndélyk Prta | To | Debating the RP:Parliamentary Procedure Debate |
| Message | you want to limit the rights of the opposition, we can not allow it! That's enough! or this anti-democratic government will give up or our country will turn into a theocratic dictatorship. People, wake up and stop supporting this government. I will say this directly and it will hurt you, because truth always hurts your government is an obstacle to the introduction of real democracy, the government is manipulated by wealthy capitalists, workers of Vanuku can not agree to it, therefore we propose new elections. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes |
Total Seats: 87 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 138 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: In cases where players introduce RP laws to a nation and then leave, Moderation reserves the discretion to declare the RP laws void if they appear to have fallen into disuse. In particular, please bear in mind that a player who is inexperienced with Particracy role-play and has joined a nation as the only party there should not generally be expected to abide by RP laws implemented by previous players who have been and left. |
| Random quote: "Men are so simple and so much inclined to obey immediate needs that a deceiver will never lack victims for his deceptions." - Niccolo Machiavelli |