We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: In Support of Greater Environmental Protection
Details
Submitted by[?]: Progressive Conservative Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2199
Description[?]:
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy towards hunting endangered animals.
Old value:: Only licensed people may hunt endangered animals.
Current: Hunting endangered animals is illegal.
Proposed: Hunting endangered animals is illegal.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Forest management.
Old value:: All forestry is performed by private companies.
Current: Local governments are required to operate forestry agencies, which own and manage all forest land.
Proposed: There is a national agency which owns all forests, but subcontracts the work to private companies.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Government policy regarding a national park system.
Old value:: The government outlaws designation of property for public parks.
Current: The government funds and maintains a network of national parks and/or marine protected areas.
Proposed: The government funds and maintains a network of national parks and/or marine protected areas.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on tree plantation.
Old value:: The government does not intervene with regard to the replantation of trees.
Current: The government requires tree plantation at higher than replacement levels for all logging or clearance operations.
Proposed: The government requires tree plantation at higher than replacement levels for all logging or clearance operations.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 02:14:26, March 12, 2006 CET | From |  NWOIAUCFCCNUCDMFSatanilicRepublicanParty | To | Debating the In Support of Greater Environmental Protection |
| Message | The SRP is against saving the environment. The SRP will vote no. |
| Date | 20:42:17, March 12, 2006 CET | From | Patriarchal Party | To | Debating the In Support of Greater Environmental Protection |
| Message | I will vote for this although I would like to see more state control of forests. |
| Date | 02:21:44, March 13, 2006 CET | From | Globalized Socialist Party | To | Debating the In Support of Greater Environmental Protection |
| Message | This looks great, chief. You got my vote. (or lack thereof) ;) |
| Date | 22:29:22, March 13, 2006 CET | From | The Evil Blueshift Party of Kittens | To | Debating the In Support of Greater Environmental Protection |
| Message | The Evil Blueshift Party of Kittens does not recognise the use for forests for recreational purposes, unless that purpose is to house axe murderers. Also we enjoy our Dodo pie too much. Therefore we must regretfully vote no |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 216 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 284 |
| Random fact: It is the collective responsibility of the players in a nation to ensure all currently binding RP laws are clearly outlined in an OOC reference bill in the "Bills under debate" section of the nation page. Confusion should not be created by displaying only some of the current RP laws or displaying RP laws which are no longer current. |
| Random quote: "You cannot open a book without learning something." - Confucius |