Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5475
Next month in: 00:24:16
Server time: 19:35:43, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (5): ADM Drax | jamescfm-sol | Moderation | Paulo Nogueira | TaMan443 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Administrative Reform Act (ARA) of 2198 Part E

Details

Submitted by[?]: Malivianese Militarist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 2201

Description[?]:

17) Larger regions will have a small advantage in representation.
18) Legislative and executive terms shall last for 48 months.
19) Total number of seats in this august body shall be 525.

~For the Federation People!~

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:57:51, March 12, 2006 CET
FromSocial Democrat League
ToDebating the Administrative Reform Act (ARA) of 2198 Part E
Message2) Too much, 3 years is fine.

3) Doesn't really matter.

Date19:58:18, March 12, 2006 CET
FromMalivia Democratic Party
ToDebating the Administrative Reform Act (ARA) of 2198 Part E
MessageAgree with article 1 and 3 only.

I disagree with article 2 because 3 years is fine. 3 game years = 6 real days. Your proposal will make it 6 game years which equals 12 real days. IMO its too long.

Also I wish article 3 could be an even number. I know some people don't like ties but I think having a tie would be cool. Infact I don't even know what happens if you have a tie, does the HoS or HoG decide or what?

Date02:35:29, March 13, 2006 CET
FromMalivianese Militarist Party
ToDebating the Administrative Reform Act (ARA) of 2198 Part E
MessageIn our experience, a tie means failure.

Date05:55:03, March 13, 2006 CET
From Protectorate Party
ToDebating the Administrative Reform Act (ARA) of 2198 Part E
Messageyou need a majority for a bill to pass, and and a tie is not one, thus it fails.

Why are we giving the advantage to larger Provinces? They already get more because they are larger now we want to give them an even greater advantage?

36 months is a good number.

301 is a good size, would rather have smaller.

Date05:20:49, March 15, 2006 CET
FromMalivianese Militarist Party
ToDebating the Administrative Reform Act (ARA) of 2198 Part E
MessageLarger provinces need more representation due to more populace.

Date09:55:16, March 15, 2006 CET
FromMalivia Democratic Party
ToDebating the Administrative Reform Act (ARA) of 2198 Part E
MessageTake out article 2 and I will support

Date17:02:55, March 15, 2006 CET
From Protectorate Party
ToDebating the Administrative Reform Act (ARA) of 2198 Part E
Messagelarger regions get more votes as it is now. This change will tip it even further in their favor.

Date02:17:17, March 16, 2006 CET
FromMalivianese Militarist Party
ToDebating the Administrative Reform Act (ARA) of 2198 Part E
MessageWould the People's Party be willing to compromise with 48 months?

As for larger regions getting more votes, that is only for the Presidential election. Assembly members that represent the larger provinces have a larger workload and more constituents. In essence, we are depriving the larger regions from fair and equal representation while smaller provinces enjoy much more attention from their representatives.

Date07:33:40, March 16, 2006 CET
FromMalivia Democratic Party
ToDebating the Administrative Reform Act (ARA) of 2198 Part E
Messagesure 48 months is fine

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 153

no
  

Total Seats: 62

abstain
   

Total Seats: 86


Random fact: Submitting a bill without any proposals in it will not attract or detract voters. It will not raise your visibility or change your political position.

Random quote: "If the Supreme Court says that you have the right to consensual [gay] sex within your home, then you have the right to bigamy, you have the right to polygamy, you have the right to incest, you have the right to adultery. You have the right to anything!" - Rick Santorum

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 69