Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5475
Next month in: 02:20:32
Server time: 09:39:27, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): dannypk19 | Mbites2 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Ethical Reform Act 4411

Details

Submitted by[?]: Labour Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 4411

Description[?]:

An Act to pass socially progressive reforms

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date12:07:24, June 19, 2018 CET
FromPeople's Communist Coalition
ToDebating the Ethical Reform Act 4411
MessageIf Article 1 is removed, we will support this bill entirely.

Date13:09:44, June 19, 2018 CET
FromLabour Party
ToDebating the Ethical Reform Act 4411
MessageIncest, while certainly disturbing, is a private matter. We shouldn't normalize it, but we shouldn't prosecute people who engage in it, which is a waste of police time
- Francine Jones

Date13:32:02, June 19, 2018 CET
FromPeople's Communist Coalition
ToDebating the Ethical Reform Act 4411
MessageWe will compromise to allow these mostly progressive reforms to take place.

Date13:50:21, June 19, 2018 CET
FromMordusian National Front
ToDebating the Ethical Reform Act 4411
MessageDue to the presence of more cons than pros, we shall vote against this bill. Too many things we disagree with, aside from the adultery proposal.

Date15:37:00, June 19, 2018 CET
FromAlternative Future
ToDebating the Ethical Reform Act 4411
MessageNot sure what is “progressive” about commodifying women’s bodies, or about restricting religious freedoms, or, indeed, about cutting back on police patrols.

The police are there to protect the public, as long as the wearing of religious headwear or necklaces does not inhibit this function we see no problem.

As for incestous relationships, they are not about love, but about hierarchy, power and control.

This is a bad bill for women and a bad bill for religious freedom. We shall vote No.

Oliver Yorke,
Leader of Alternative Future

Date18:49:23, June 19, 2018 CET
FromLabour Party
ToDebating the Ethical Reform Act 4411
MessageMr. Speaker, I shall address some of the right honourable gentleman's questions,

On the issue of surrogacy, if the baby isn't harmed and both the mother and prospective parents are mentally stable, I see no problem with, as Mr. Yorke put it, commodifying women's bodies

On the issue of religious clothing, and I'm speaking as a Hosian Bishopal woman here, if public servants are not allowed to wear hats or other frivolous clothing items, then we shouldn't treat religious clothing differently

On the issue of police patrols, arrests for petty crimes have gone up by 20%, with immigrant communities being especially hard hit

The Alternative Future has shown themselves to be pure ideology with their opposition to this bill. In other words, nothing I didn't expect.

Francine Jones,
SP Leader

Date19:35:12, June 19, 2018 CET
FromAlternative Future
ToDebating the Ethical Reform Act 4411
MessageWell you clearly aren’t a very serious ‘Hosian Bishopal woman’ if you think religious clothing is remotely similar to ‘hats or other frivolous clothing.’ ‘Frivolous’, you said. What an outrageously demeaning and insulting thing to say to the millions of devoutly religious citizens across our nation.

‘I see no problem with, as Mr. Yorke put it, commodifying women's bodies.’

That sentence may explain why female voters have deserted your party in droves. The female body is not a commodity to be used for financial gain, be that via surrogacy, prostitution or any other form. Any attempt to institute the profit motive into surrogacy will lead to exploitation.

And you rounded off by making insinuations about our hardworking police officers.

As you said yourself, nothing I didn’t expect.

Oliver Yorke,
Leader of Alternative Future

Date04:38:11, June 20, 2018 CET
FromPeople's Communist Coalition
ToDebating the Ethical Reform Act 4411
MessageThe AF claims that women have deserted the Socialist Party in droves, while the AF ironically hardly gets any votes from women. Our country is a progressive one that values social freedoms, so women should be able to access them.
Regards,
Sebastian Gallagher

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 186

no
  

Total Seats: 147

abstain
 

Total Seats: 27


Random fact: Head to the "Language assistance" thread to receive and offer help with translations: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6368

Random quote: "Voting Tory will cause your wife to have bigger breasts and increase your chances of owning a BMW M3." - Boris Johnson

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 109