Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5475
Next month in: 03:18:00
Server time: 12:41:59, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): echizen | HawkDun | Mbites2 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Roleplay Direction Consent

Details

Submitted by[?]: Beluzian Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 4412

Description[?]:

OOC: This bill will let us see which parties currently support how roleplay is being directed regarding the Presidency of Dr Wewecho Pantafloja Junior and which ones do not. Debate is also allowed. Yes means support for it.

The bill is completely OOC.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:58:05, June 20, 2018 CET
FromBeluzian Party
ToDebating the Roleplay Direction Consent
MessageComment before voting.

Date22:12:48, June 20, 2018 CET
FromLiberty Party
ToDebating the Roleplay Direction Consent
MessageOf course nobody will have noticed the 300 seat head start you've given yourself in this vote.....

Date22:59:34, June 20, 2018 CET
FromLiberty Party
ToDebating the Roleplay Direction Consent
MessageOne man one vote for an OOC test like this would be infinitely more sensible.

Date23:19:24, June 20, 2018 CET
FromUnited Party
ToDebating the Roleplay Direction Consent
MessageA note if there are disapprovals the direction must be revered this is an RP effecting all of us, as such it must be approved by all of us.

Date23:23:14, June 20, 2018 CET
FromUnited Party
ToDebating the Roleplay Direction Consent
MessageAnd I will not approve the direction of the President, which is heading towards another dictorial crackdown, until a Civil War RP plan is drawn up and confirmed, at which point you’d be locked into the RP, unlike the last time when you acted like you’d help make the Civil War RP in exchange for us approving your dictorial RPs and then refused to move forwards with that RP.

Date23:27:11, June 20, 2018 CET
FromUnited Party
ToDebating the Roleplay Direction Consent
MessageThat’s my statement on the matter, no dictator-like takeover without a civil war following.

Date07:53:00, June 21, 2018 CET
FromAgrarian Citizens' Initiative
ToDebating the Roleplay Direction Consent
MessageYour tally of 303 seats are a disadvantage for us.

Date12:33:19, June 21, 2018 CET
FromUnited Party
ToDebating the Roleplay Direction Consent
MessageAgain it doesn’t matter how many seats they have, any opposition causes the RP to have the be changed, since it’s a nationwide matter that effects all of us.

Date12:43:32, June 21, 2018 CET
FromLiberty Party
ToDebating the Roleplay Direction Consent
MessageWe concur with UPs view.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 303

no
    

Total Seats: 255

abstain
   

Total Seats: 192


Random fact: Cultural Protocols should generally be reflective of RP conducted within the nation and should not significantly alter or modify the ethnic, religious or linguistic composition without considerable and reasonable role-play or other justification.

Random quote: "We’ve got to stand with our North Korean allies." - Sarah Palin

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 60