We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Government policy regarding pharmaceutical drugs.
Details
Submitted by[?]: National progressive party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 4428
Description[?]:
| the government pays partially for all citizens' pharmaceutical drugs, and pays entirely for those of low income citizens. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Pharmaceutical drugs policy.
Old value:: The government pays for all citizens' pharmaceutical drugs.
Current: The government pays for all citizens' pharmaceutical drugs.
Proposed: The government pays partially for all citizens' pharmaceutical drugs, and pays entirely for those of low income citizens.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 10:31:14, July 22, 2018 CET | From | National progressive party | To | Debating the Government policy regarding pharmaceutical drugs. |
| Message | Why the government is paying for all citizens pharmaceutical drugs? the government should pay for the low income citizens and paritally for all citizens. |
| Date | 15:40:42, July 22, 2018 CET | From | Socialist Party of Kalistan (SPoK) | To | Debating the Government policy regarding pharmaceutical drugs. |
| Message | Comrade: Are you FROM Kalistan? These are very basic questions that you are asking. EVERYone takes for granted that drugs are heavily subsidized in Kalistan. We have not met a single person who questions the essential logic of pharmaceutical subsidies. As the members of your Party were born and raised in Kalistan, I assume that you, or someone you all knew has benefited from free medicine. We would therefore wonder why this sudden bewilderment at a very basic pillar of Kalistani economics has come over the Comrade from the Progressive Party, when means-testing of social programs is a tool of Conservatives to undermine and destroy social spending by dividing the part of the society that benefits against the part of the society that is forbidden to benefit by law. |
| Date | 16:01:41, July 22, 2018 CET | From | New Liberal Alliance (NLA) | To | Debating the Government policy regarding pharmaceutical drugs. |
| Message | The right to free medicine aside, the NLA invites the NPP to look at the pharmaceutical systems in other countries. Even for middle class families, a need for constant and regular medication can be crushing for one's finances. The NLA does not believe people on an arbitrary line should have to choose between medicine and heating, for example. We oppose. Moira Olivier Health & Social Services Spokesperson, New Liberal Alliance |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 750 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "Non-violence is not a garment to be put on and off at will. Its seat is in the heart, and it must be an inseparable part of our very being." - Mahatma Gandhi |