Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5475
Next month in: 03:00:17
Server time: 00:59:42, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): dnobb | ImperialLodamun | Moderation | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Public Mobilization Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Republican Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 4445

Description[?]:

-

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:00:29, August 27, 2018 CET
FromSunrise Party 해돋이당
ToDebating the Public Mobilization Act
MessageDear Gongeugdang,

This would not be a good move. Paramilitaries have been a cause of much disharmony in the land in days long past and so were abolished to preserve the peace and wellbeing of the citizenry. Because of this, we shall vote no.

Signed,
Lady Hwangje

Date01:09:20, August 27, 2018 CET
FromPeople's Socialist Party
ToDebating the Public Mobilization Act
MessageTo the speaker of the Republican Party,

This could lead to the legalization of terrorist groups and privatized mercenary groups.

Date11:18:15, August 27, 2018 CET
FromConservative Party (보수당)
ToDebating the Public Mobilization Act
MessageDear speaker,

We agree with the fellow parties. This could lead to an increase in terroism as well as disharmony. It will also allow jealous parties to try and rebel against the legitimate government which would cause chaos

Toby Sung
Minister of Interior Affairs

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 0

no
   

Total Seats: 260

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

    Random quote: "Those who expect to reap the blessing of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it. " - Thomas Paine

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 54