We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Public Mobilization Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Republican Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 4445
Description[?]:
- |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government's position on paramilitaries.
Old value:: Paramilitaries are illegal and the recognized government may intervene freely to stop any possible activity.
Current: Paramilitaries are illegal and the recognized government may intervene freely to stop any possible activity.
Proposed: Paramilitaries are allowed with full privileges, with the right to intervene when necessary.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 01:00:29, August 27, 2018 CET | From | Sunrise Party 해돋이당 | To | Debating the Public Mobilization Act |
Message | Dear Gongeugdang, This would not be a good move. Paramilitaries have been a cause of much disharmony in the land in days long past and so were abolished to preserve the peace and wellbeing of the citizenry. Because of this, we shall vote no. Signed, Lady Hwangje |
Date | 01:09:20, August 27, 2018 CET | From | People's Socialist Party | To | Debating the Public Mobilization Act |
Message | To the speaker of the Republican Party, This could lead to the legalization of terrorist groups and privatized mercenary groups. |
Date | 11:18:15, August 27, 2018 CET | From | Conservative Party (보수당) | To | Debating the Public Mobilization Act |
Message | Dear speaker, We agree with the fellow parties. This could lead to an increase in terroism as well as disharmony. It will also allow jealous parties to try and rebel against the legitimate government which would cause chaos Toby Sung Minister of Interior Affairs |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes |
Total Seats: 0 | |||
no | Total Seats: 260 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
Random quote: "Those who expect to reap the blessing of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it. " - Thomas Paine |