We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Religious Act of 4450
Details
Submitted by[?]: Democratic-Social Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 4451
Description[?]:
In a recent bill presented on this floor, we realized there are certain aspects about our current religious system and policies we differ in, which is why we are presenting our own version of this bill. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy concerning the visitation of foreign missionaries.
Old value:: The government has no policy concerning the visitation of foreign missionaries.
Current: The government determines which missionaries are permitted to visit on a person by person basis.
Proposed: Foreign missionaries are welcomed and encouraged by the government.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The state's policy concerning religious clothing.
Old value:: Public officials are not allowed to wear religious symbols while exercising their duties.
Current: Wearing religious clothing or religious symbols in public is illegal.
Proposed: There are no laws regulating the wearing of religious clothing and the wearing of religious symbols.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy with respect to prayer in schools.
Old value:: Teacher-led prayers in schools are forbidden.
Current: Teacher-led prayers in schools are forbidden, except in religious schools.
Proposed: Teacher-led prayers in schools are forbidden, except in religious schools.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 01:20:35, September 07, 2018 CET | From | Democratic-Social Party | To | Debating the Religious Act of 4450 |
Message | We stand by these reforms because we believe that even though the State is secular and must remain as such, we can't directly intervene in people's personal beliefs, including Representatives, policemen, firemen, etc. We need to recognize that we are a diverse country and that respecting everyone's beliefs is necessary for a successful nation. Eunice Fowler Democratic Party House Speaker |
Date | 02:14:52, September 07, 2018 CET | From | Three Acres Party | To | Debating the Religious Act of 4450 |
Message | Although the Three Acres Party stands by its own version of the bill, it will back this version as well. Some change is better than no change at all. |
Date | 20:18:15, September 07, 2018 CET | From | Democratic Liberal Party | To | Debating the Religious Act of 4450 |
Message | There is a clear separation between church and state. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 161 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 91 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 13 |
Random fact: When it comes to creating a Cultural Protocol in a Culturally Open nation, players are not necessarily required to provide a plausible backstory for how the nation's cultural background developed. However, the provision of a plausible backstory may be a factor in whether Moderation approves the Cultural Protocol if players in surrounding nations question its appropriateness for their region of the game map. |
Random quote: "Popular suffrage is in itself no guarantee of freedom. People can vote themselves into slavery." - Frank Chodorov |