We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Tukarali Security Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Rightist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2203
Description[?]:
| This act will make our nation safe once again. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The citizens' right to assemble in public.
Old value:: The police may disperse a group if they believe it poses a potential risk to public safety.
Current: The police may disperse a group if they believe it poses a potential risk to public safety.
Proposed: The police may disperse a group without giving any reason.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Right to privacy.
Old value:: Individuals have a right to privacy, but the courts can force individuals to give information on certain matters if needed. (also known as Habeas Data).
Current: Individuals have a right to privacy, to keep records and information for themselves.
Proposed: The government has the right to monitor information of individuals without letting them know.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:28:14, March 16, 2006 CET | From | Social-Conservative party | To | Debating the Tukarali Security Act |
| Message | we support |
| Date | 20:38:08, March 16, 2006 CET | From | Patriot Party | To | Debating the Tukarali Security Act |
| Message | support as well. |
| Date | 18:20:28, March 17, 2006 CET | From | Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Tukarali Security Act |
| Message | We oppose.. This isn't about making out nation safer, rather about turning it into a police state. Ulby Jr. |
| Date | 19:46:54, March 17, 2006 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Tukarali Security Act |
| Message | Its more about securing our nation than turning it into a police state. |
| Date | 20:09:29, March 17, 2006 CET | From | One Nation Socialist Party | To | Debating the Tukarali Security Act |
| Message | know its more about a police state. Why are these bills needed? There is no one who would be likely to test the security of our nation! Thisi endangers civil rights for no reason. |
| Date | 19:37:32, March 18, 2006 CET | From | One Nation Socialist Party | To | Debating the Tukarali Security Act |
| Message | thisw isn't providing our people with security but making them more vulnerable to the police, who could effectively control their lives. We believe the individual being allowed to flourish in life on their own. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 137 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 139 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 23 |
| Random fact: Particracy allows you to establish an unelected head of state like a monarch or a president-for-life, but doing this is a bit of a process. First elect a candidate with the name "." to the Head of State position. Then change your law on the "Structure of the executive branch" to "The head of state is hereditary and symbolic; the head of government chairs the cabinet" and change the "formal title of the head of state" to how you want the new head of state's title and name to appear (eg. King Percy XVI). |
| Random quote: "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." - Aristotle |