Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5573
Next month in: 00:09:13
Server time: 03:50:46, November 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): itsjustgav | wstodden2 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: National Postoffice Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Patriot Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2203

Description[?]:

This act will ban private lettercarriers but will leave package carriers alone.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:16:27, March 16, 2006 CET
FromSocial-Conservative party
ToDebating the National Postoffice Act
MessageSo far the highly regulated private post offices has proved to be a good asset to the society.

Date02:02:53, March 17, 2006 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the National Postoffice Act
MessageWe'll support this bill as it'll make the post office run efficently than the moras we have now.

Date05:17:25, March 17, 2006 CET
FromGreenish Liberal Democratic Socialists
ToDebating the National Postoffice Act
Messageagain....

Date18:32:11, March 17, 2006 CET
FromGreenish Liberal Democratic Socialists
ToDebating the National Postoffice Act
Message..st

Date19:59:12, March 17, 2006 CET
FromOne Nation Socialist Party
ToDebating the National Postoffice Act
Messagewe shall oppose this. Why ban private ones when they take away some of the responsibility of the nationalised one enabling it to be more able to provide the service. Nothing bad come out of both private and public post offices.

Date01:57:44, March 19, 2006 CET
FromGreenish Liberal Democratic Socialists
ToDebating the National Postoffice Act
MessageOOC: Anyone noticed my "play of words"? :P

Date20:56:53, March 20, 2006 CET
FromOne Nation Socialist Party
ToDebating the National Postoffice Act
MessageOOC:yes.VERY GOODlol

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 91

no
   

Total Seats: 185

abstain
   

Total Seats: 23


Random fact: Party candidates for head of state elections are not visible to the public. This means that you cannot see who will run and who will not, which adds another strategic element to the elections.

Random quote: "If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator." - George W. Bush

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 63