We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Border Security Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Patriot Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2203
Description[?]:
| This act will help us secure our borders and to keep out the foreign riff raff. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Travel by foreigners to the nation.
Old value:: The nation imposes minimal border controls on visitors, with cursory security checks, to confirm visitor identities.
Current: The nation imposes minimal border controls on visitors, with cursory security checks, to confirm visitor identities.
Proposed: The nation imposes strict border control on visitors, with intensive security checks, to maintain law and order.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 02:04:28, March 17, 2006 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Border Security Act |
| Message | We support the measure. We have to secure our borders. |
| Date | 18:29:45, March 17, 2006 CET | From | Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Border Security Act |
| Message | Needles to say we oppose since we supported the current law |
| Date | 19:39:10, March 17, 2006 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Border Security Act |
| Message | A law that does nothing in securing our borders? |
| Date | 10:35:45, March 18, 2006 CET | From | One Nation Socialist Party | To | Debating the Border Security Act |
| Message | cursory checks do all that is necessary to make sure we let in people that are not going to be problem for us. Intensive puts of tourists. |
| Date | 01:23:28, March 19, 2006 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Border Security Act |
| Message | No a cursory check doesn't do all that is necessary. This will make sure we do all that is necessary to make sure we don't let in those that want to harm our nation |
| Date | 19:07:24, March 20, 2006 CET | From | Social-Conservative party | To | Debating the Border Security Act |
| Message | We oppose |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 91 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 185 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 23 |
| Random fact: "OOC", "IC" and "IG" are commonly-used acronyms in Particracy. "OOC" refers to comments, discussions and actions which are out-of-character, meaning they are done player-to-player rather than party-to-party. "IC" refers to in-character interactions (ie. party-to-party). Similarly, "IG" means in-game, although this term may also simply refer to what happens in the actual game interface, as opposed to on the forum or elsewhere. "RP" just means "role-play". |
| Random quote: "The use of solar energy has not been opened up because the oil industry does not own the sun." - Ralph Nader |