We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Economic freedom act of 4456
Details
Submitted by[?]: Confederal Freedom Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 4457
Description[?]:
| . |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's stance on a salary cap.
Old value:: There is a national maximum wage but local governments may enforce stricter salary caps.
Current: Labour unions and organizations of employers negotiate a salary cap.
Proposed: The government has no stance on a salary cap.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 15:13:52, September 18, 2018 CET | From | Confederal Freedom Party | To | Debating the Economic freedom act of 4456 |
| Message | Why should the government tell a private business how much it can pay an employee? |
| Date | 15:59:03, September 18, 2018 CET | From | Unsubmissive Beluzian Workers Party | To | Debating the Economic freedom act of 4456 |
| Message | What party would be so stupid so as to call for a cap on how much the working class gets paid? How are we going to stimulate economic growth if people are limited in financial resources? |
| Date | 16:29:30, September 18, 2018 CET | From | Liberty Party | To | Debating the Economic freedom act of 4456 |
| Message | Glad to see the red-pilling is taking effect, UBWP. There is hope to turn you in to a fully fledged free marketeer party yet! |
| Date | 16:30:12, September 18, 2018 CET | From | Liberty Party | To | Debating the Economic freedom act of 4456 |
| Message | Commies voted for it too. Is this bizarro world? |
| Date | 16:35:01, September 18, 2018 CET | From | Unsubmissive Beluzian Workers Party | To | Debating the Economic freedom act of 4456 |
| Message | I think it's common sense that salary caps leaves employees with little chance for increasing their salaries, which might cause them to be complacent or have just about the same performance because they don't have an incentive to improve because as they won't receive an increase based on their performance evaluations. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 480 | |||||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 20 |
| Random fact: "OOC", "IC" and "IG" are commonly-used acronyms in Particracy. "OOC" refers to comments, discussions and actions which are out-of-character, meaning they are done player-to-player rather than party-to-party. "IC" refers to in-character interactions (ie. party-to-party). Similarly, "IG" means in-game, although this term may also simply refer to what happens in the actual game interface, as opposed to on the forum or elsewhere. "RP" just means "role-play". |
| Random quote: "The National Rifle Association says, 'Guns don't kill people; people kill people,' but I think the gun helps." - Eddie Izzard |