Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5476
Next month in: 00:07:40
Server time: 03:52:19, April 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): albaniansunited | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: External policy reforms

Details

Submitted by[?]: Liberal-Conservitives

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2220

Description[?]:

as before an ajustment to any existing areas not coverd in the before.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date10:43:16, March 17, 2006 CET
From Liberal-Conservitives
ToDebating the External policy reforms
Messagein explination. i was intrested in Renewable energy, but that had already been changed.
animal registration. simple. keep the numbers of "wild" (eg ferrel) pets to a limit.
any feedback is welcome.

Date15:45:44, March 17, 2006 CET
From Liberal Democrats
ToDebating the External policy reforms
MessageNo to article 2. We should keep our hands of supporting any method of generating electricity and let the free market decide :)

Date15:45:54, March 17, 2006 CET
From Liberal Democrats
ToDebating the External policy reforms
MessageAlso no to article one.

Date17:11:08, March 17, 2006 CET
From Free Radicals
ToDebating the External policy reforms
MessageI quite like the pet census idea. It would definitely make it a lot easier for animal charities to do their job and would make the abandonment of animals a less common practice. Sure it's an example of big government, but it could be a useful inflation of our role in society.

As for nuclear power... no chance.

Date04:14:12, March 18, 2006 CET
From Liberal-Conservitives
ToDebating the External policy reforms
Messageas i mentions i was more intrested in the renewable energy, but that had alredy been changed. i am trying to sponser a move away from hydrocarbon (eg Coal) means of power. Nuclear power is the best form for what it produces.

Date04:55:25, March 18, 2006 CET
From Libertarian Party of Valruzia
ToDebating the External policy reforms
MessageNo

Date04:22:53, March 28, 2006 CET
From Sophian Party for Social Anarchism
ToDebating the External policy reforms
Messagearticle one yes, two no

Date23:40:23, March 29, 2006 CET
From Temujin
ToDebating the External policy reforms
MessageWe do not support either article.

Date17:01:44, April 03, 2006 CET
From Red Front
ToDebating the External policy reforms
MessageWe like both of them. Why shuldn't we make some cheap energy, that does not create contamination?
And article 2: We like it because it makes things a lot easyier to control. Then it would be a lot easyier to prevent mistreament of animals...

Date03:27:21, April 26, 2006 CET
From Valruzian Republican Party
ToDebating the External policy reforms
MessageI agree with 2 but 1 is totally unneeded. Why are these two proposals in the same bill anyway? How about we try and keep related proposals together?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 40

no
     

Total Seats: 261

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Whilst the use of non-English languages can be appropriate for nation names, party names, constitutional titles and other variables, English is the official language of communication in the game. All descriptive texts and public communications should be in English or at least appear alongside a full English translation.

    Random quote: "Men who have greatness in them don't go in for politics." - Albert Camus

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 91