We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Animal Protection Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: RSDP - Democratic Front
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2036
Description[?]:
| An Act to prevent the use of animals for cosmetics research. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The use of animals in cosmetics research.
Old value:: The use of animals to test cosmetic products is unregulated.
Current: The use of animals to test cosmetic products is regulated.
Proposed: The use of animals to test cosmetic products is regulated.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | not recorded | From |   RSDP - Democratic Front | To | Debating the Animal Protection Act |
| Message | I'll ask the same question again here: Has any of the parties suggestions or comments on or objections to this proposed bill? |
| Date | not recorded | From | New Democrats of Rutania | To | Debating the Animal Protection Act |
| Message | New Democrats will not support this. |
| Date | not recorded | From | New Democrats of Rutania | To | Debating the Animal Protection Act |
| Message | New Democrats will not support this. |
| Date | not recorded | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Animal Protection Act |
| Message | May be used for testing cosmetic products. |
| Date | not recorded | From | Libertarian Alcoholic Par-tay | To | Debating the Animal Protection Act |
| Message | Libertarian Alcoholics do not support this. Animal testing is just fine in our book. |
| Date | not recorded | From | New Democrats of Rutania | To | Debating the Animal Protection Act |
| Message | Conservatives, you said "may be used for testing cosmetic products" but voted yes. Why? |
| Date | not recorded | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Animal Protection Act |
| Message | Look at the current? I'm assuming that the 'are used' is just a typo, and the intention of the proposal intends to say 'may be used' |
| Date | not recorded | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Animal Protection Act |
| Message | Hahah, okay, I see |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 25 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Large scale RP planning (such as wars, regional/continental conflicts, economic collapse, etc.) should be planned (as best as it can be) and should have consent of a majority of players involved. |
| Random quote: "The spread of evil is the symptom of a vacuum. Whenever evil wins, it is only by default: by the moral failure of those who evade the fact that there can be no compromise on basic principles." - Ayn Rand |