We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Income tax proposal of October 4465
Details
Submitted by[?]: Jiyū Party of Sekouo (自由党)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill proposes to change income taxes. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 4466
Description[?]:
The Jiyū Party of Sekowo (自由党) propose to adjust the government's income tax policy to better address the economic situation of the セコオの天国帝国 (Sekouo no Tengoku Teikoku). |
Proposals
Article 1
We propose to alter income tax brackets to the following setup. Information about the current income tax system can be found here.
Bracket | Tax | Estimated Revenue |
> 10,000 SEK | 13% | 51,849,000,000 SEK | Total | 51,849,000,000 SEK |
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 03:46:26, October 07, 2018 CET | From | Jiyū Party of Sekouo (自由党) | To | Debating the Income tax proposal of October 4465 |
Message | This flat tax of 13% on 10,000 SEK and above we believe would be a fair tax that is adjusted to allow for a surplus under our new spending bill which gives a major boost to the military and education which we hope all parties can support. The military funding boost is in response to growing foreign threats to Sekowo. Official Statement of the Jiyū Party of Sekowo (自由党) |
Date | 07:27:40, October 07, 2018 CET | From | 立憲維新党 (Rikken Ishin-tō) | To | Debating the Income tax proposal of October 4465 |
Message | Our party supports the lower tax rate. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 271 | |||
no | Total Seats: 35 | |||
abstain |
Total Seats: 71 |
Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
Random quote: "You can't get rid of poverty by giving people money." - P. J. O'Rourke |