We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Patients' Rights Act 4473
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberté et Égalité
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 4475
Description[?]:
| Under this Law, the decision of the patients will not be punished and the state will not interfere with this. The doctors will not be persecuted by the desicion of their patients and they are not forced to fulfill it. Agreements on euthanasia are exempt from any judicial interference |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The right to euthanasia.
Old value:: Euthanasia is illegal but not considered murder.
Current: Euthanasia is allowed with consent from the patient and the treating doctor.
Proposed: Euthanasia is allowed with consent from the patient and the treating doctor.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:18:59, October 21, 2018 CET | From | Liberté et Égalité | To | Debating the Patients' Rights Act 4473 |
| Message | From our government, we defend the patient's determination on his life. In this sense, we seek to modernize(again) the legislation. This is not compulsive law, it is about agreements between the patient and the doctor. Both will have to give explicit consent. Ozoliņš Ervīns Raimonds Minister of Health |
| Date | 21:44:31, October 21, 2018 CET | From | Legiunea Salvării Naționale | To | Debating the Patients' Rights Act 4473 |
| Message | The National Legion supports this progressive legislation, and prays that as many weak and sickly New Endralonians and Kuzaki parasites as possible will take advantage of this law, strengthening the gene pool of the glorious Kizenian nation! Subcomandant Nicolae Sângecuratescu, Legionary Spokesman on Matters of National Health |
| Date | 14:29:31, October 22, 2018 CET | From | Liberal Internationalist Party | To | Debating the Patients' Rights Act 4473 |
| Message | This is unconstitutional. |
| Date | 21:25:51, October 23, 2018 CET | From | Liberté et Égalité | To | Debating the Patients' Rights Act 4473 |
| Message | This article is totally constitutional. It does not obligate or kill anyone, it is a personal option. In any case, we are going to organize a referendum on the subject. So we will change the title. OOC I'm still not sure how the referendum system works |
| Date | 19:00:23, October 24, 2018 CET | From | Liberal Internationalist Party | To | Debating the Patients' Rights Act 4473 |
| Message | Allowing Euthanasia directly violates right to life upon conception to natural death ,are you intelectually disabled ? |
| Date | 20:00:32, October 24, 2018 CET | From | Liberté et Égalité | To | Debating the Patients' Rights Act 4473 |
| Message | As we already noticed, conservative-reactionary gentlemen, the constitutional principle is not contradictory with this bill. The State is not actively exercising any clause. The right is an agreement between private parties. The state does not interfere in any way. The "right of natural death" belongs to the patient, but it is not an obligation to die naturally. On the other hand, we are talking about a patient's right and it is not impulsive. In fact, it is maintained without any state interference, even judicial, so that even the doctor can reject his practice. We believe that it is a good point in common and that it will give legitimacy to what is stated here. Ozoliņš Ervīns Raimonds Ministro de Salud (OOC finally I did not understand how the referendum system works) |
| Date | 20:08:07, October 24, 2018 CET | From | Liberal Internationalist Party | To | Debating the Patients' Rights Act 4473 |
| Message | This is obligation ,allowing these is unconsitutitional ,state shouldn't terminate lives before natural end ,this will be unconstitutional. |
| Date | 20:08:40, October 24, 2018 CET | From | Liberal Internationalist Party | To | Debating the Patients' Rights Act 4473 |
| Message | What's your problem with Conservatism ? |
| Date | 04:22:34, October 25, 2018 CET | From | Liberté et Égalité | To | Debating the Patients' Rights Act 4473 |
| Message | This is an option and a patient's right, which can be accessed with the consent of the doctor that will perform the practice. If the article said "Euthanasia is mandated for the old and sick" it would not be a right and then, yes, the State would be actively violating the constitutional principles. But this is not what happens. The state does not exercise any action in this agreement between private parties. Ozoliņš Ervīns Raimonds Ministro de Salud |
| Date | 16:37:20, October 25, 2018 CET | From | Liberal Internationalist Party | To | Debating the Patients' Rights Act 4473 |
| Message | Private Parties ? |
| Date | 16:37:32, October 25, 2018 CET | From | Liberal Internationalist Party | To | Debating the Patients' Rights Act 4473 |
| Message | This is obligation ,allowing these is unconsitutitional ,state shouldn't terminate lives before natural end ,this will be unconstitutional. |
| Date | 18:28:07, October 25, 2018 CET | From | Liberté et Égalité | To | Debating the Patients' Rights Act 4473 |
| Message | What "obligation"? where? In what part of a agreements between people (like this one) is the state obligation? OOC particular agreements |
| Date | 17:22:45, October 26, 2018 CET | From | Liberal Internationalist Party | To | Debating the Patients' Rights Act 4473 |
| Message | Regardless of be obligation this is unconstitutional . |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 318 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 282 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: The forum contains a lot of useful information, it has updates to the game, role playing between nations, news and discussion. http://forum.particracy.net/ |
| Random quote: "Stupid people are ruining America." - Herman Cain |