We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Comprehensive Military Reform Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberal Internationalist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 4475
Description[?]:
. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of nuclear weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to nuclear weapons in retaliation to a nuclear, chemical or biological attack.
Current: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in warfare for any reason.
Proposed: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons on non-civilian areas.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Appointment of military officers
Old value:: Individual units elect their officers.
Current: The Ministry of Defense is authorized to appoint military officers.
Proposed: The Ministry of Defense is authorized to appoint military officers.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 19:06:05, October 25, 2018 CET | From | Liberté et Égalité | To | Debating the Comprehensive Military Reform Bill |
Message | Apparently, it is very complicated for the honorable reactionary deputies to explain a single word of this legislation. In this government, we have had to expel or degrade more than 200 military officers. the reason? they got their position not because they are the best. They got them for having close political ties. This is what happens when a government leaves in political hands what should be a military issue. And the reactionary party not only wants to return to these old "golden" times. They want to return to the old system where the military looked for the friendship of the defense ministry to get a promotion. We could support the other article, but this is not going to accompany it. Pálffi Marton Minister of Defence |
Date | 19:07:54, October 25, 2018 CET | From | Liberté et Égalité | To | Debating the Comprehensive Military Reform Bill |
Message | Apparently, it is very complicated for the honorable reactionary deputies to explain a single word of this legislation. In this government, we have had to expel or degrade more than 200 military officers. the reason? they got their position not because they are the best. They got them for having close political ties. This is what happens when a government leaves in political hands what should be a military issue. And the reactionary party not only wants to return to these old "golden" times. They want to return to the old system where the military looked for the friendship of the defense ministry to get a promotion. We could support the other article, but this is not going to accompany it. Pálffi Marton Minister of Defence |
Date | 17:21:37, October 26, 2018 CET | From | Liberal Internationalist Party | To | Debating the Comprehensive Military Reform Bill |
Message | Professionals should appoint military officers, this is job of minister. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes | Total Seats: 282 | ||
no | Total Seats: 0 | ||
abstain |
Total Seats: 318 |
Random fact: Selucia is Particracy's modern take on Ancient Rome, located on the continent of Majatra. |
Random quote: "The key to understanding the American system is to imagine that you have the power to make nearly any law you want, but your worst enemy will be the one to enforce it." - Rick Cook |