We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the North Selayan Military Co-Operation Treaty.
Details
Submitted by[?]: Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2203
Description[?]:
| This bill asks for the ratification of the North Selayan Military Co-Operation Treaty.. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the North Selayan Military Co-Operation Treaty..
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:36:20, March 19, 2006 CET | From | Libertad y Justicia | To | Debating the Ratification of the North Selayan Military Co-Operation Treaty. |
| Message | I agree. It would be a great way to protect ourselves and strengthen our military power, while at the same time promoting peace and helping to ensure that our world remains more peaceful. |
| Date | 10:09:14, March 20, 2006 CET | From | Revolutionary Socialist Alliance | To | Debating the Ratification of the North Selayan Military Co-Operation Treaty. |
| Message | We do not feel happy at passing a motion which would allow foreign soldiers to move in our country, nor to be formally constrained to help out another country by signing an agreement. |
| Date | 11:55:33, March 20, 2006 CET | From | Fatherland Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the North Selayan Military Co-Operation Treaty. |
| Message | This is good but we can't accept this: 1. Military forces from allied nations will be given full transit rights and all reasonable assistance to move across the territory of any member state. This includes access to Airports, Seaports, Railway installations etc, both civilian and military. Local military commanders may commandeer rolling stock, aircraft, ships or other transport as necessary in order to move troops to the designated area. So we will vote no. We can't betray our nation like the Liberal Libertarian Party does all the time. What if they occupy our nation without firing a shot abusing these transit rights? They can move their troops to strategic positions and conquer us. |
| Date | 12:55:06, March 20, 2006 CET | From |  Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX | To | Debating the Ratification of the North Selayan Military Co-Operation Treaty. |
| Message | "What if they occupy our nation without firing a shot abusing these transit rights?" Then its hardly an occupation if they aren't actually using violence is it? "They can move their troops to strategic positions and conquer us." As we can to them. If they step over the line, how long do you think it will take our forces in their nation to respond in kind? How do you think the other members of the agreement will feel if someone steps over that line? Are you really that blind that you can't see the checks that even out such a system? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 157 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 146 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 105 |
| Random fact: Once approved, players should copy Cultural Protocols into a bill in the debate section of their nation page, under the title of "OOC: Cultural Protocols". This bill should include links to the passed Cultural Protocol bill and the Moderation approval. |
| Random quote: "Politics is for the present, but an equation is for eternity." - Albert Einstein |