We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Privacy Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Populist Islamic Workers' League
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2203
Description[?]:
| We believe that people should have the right to keep information to themselves. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The confidentiality of letters and correspondence.
Old value:: The confidentiality of letters is inviolable, but the justice dept. can violate it in extreme situations.
Current: The confidentiality of letters is inviolable, but the justice dept. can violate the confidentiality of letters with grounded cause.
Proposed: The confidentiality of letters is inviolable.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Right to privacy.
Old value:: Individuals have a right to privacy, but the courts can force individuals to give information on certain matters if needed. (also known as Habeas Data).
Current: Individuals have a right to privacy, but the courts can force individuals to give information on certain matters if needed. (also known as Habeas Data).
Proposed: Individuals have a right to privacy, to keep records and information for themselves.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 03:59:29, March 20, 2006 CET | From | Liberal Party of Indrala | To | Debating the Privacy Act |
| Message | We like the fact that the RGSP is displaying a devotion to principles of liberty, but we are also devoted to principles of justice, and we don't want them to be comprimised by these proposals. |
| Date | 11:24:32, March 20, 2006 CET | From | Inrala Panjoregu Kiokutou (DPP) | To | Debating the Privacy Act |
| Message | The current laws are a necessary evil. Opposed. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 67 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 25 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: "OOC", "IC" and "IG" are commonly-used acronyms in Particracy. "OOC" refers to comments, discussions and actions which are out-of-character, meaning they are done player-to-player rather than party-to-party. "IC" refers to in-character interactions (ie. party-to-party). Similarly, "IG" means in-game, although this term may also simply refer to what happens in the actual game interface, as opposed to on the forum or elsewhere. "RP" just means "role-play". |
| Random quote: "In all recorded history there has not been one economist who has had to worry about where the next meal would come from." - Peter Drucker |