We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Public Morality Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Covenanters (IA)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2203
Description[?]:
An act to set standards for public behaviour in order to prevent vile acts of indecency and widespead sin. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on public nudity.
Old value:: There are no laws with regards to public nudity, it is allowed.
Current: There are no laws with regards to public nudity, it is allowed.
Proposed: Public nudity is illegal, but private nudist colonies and beaches are permitted.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Displays of public affection and obscenity laws.
Old value:: There are no laws regarding obscene public acts.
Current: Local governments may regulate laws on public acts of affection and obscenity.
Proposed: All sexually implicit actions are illegal in public.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 14:34:11, March 20, 2006 CET | From | Luthori Tory Party | To | Debating the Public Morality Act |
Message | You'll be begging to repeal this by August, I tell you now... |
Date | 14:35:46, March 20, 2006 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the Public Morality Act |
Message | Why? |
Date | 14:46:45, March 20, 2006 CET | From | Luthori Tory Party | To | Debating the Public Morality Act |
Message | Well, if this summer is as hot as the last one was... |
Date | 14:53:40, March 20, 2006 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the Public Morality Act |
Message | I can assure you I won't be walking around naked, no matter the weather. Think of the skin cancer rates if this doesn't pass! |
Date | 14:56:49, March 20, 2006 CET | From | Luthori Tory Party | To | Debating the Public Morality Act |
Message | If people choose to be silly, and/or careless it's their own fault - the LTP cannot support a nanny state. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 175 | |||
no |
Total Seats: 275 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 300 |
Random fact: Real-life organisations should not be referenced in Particracy, unless they are simple and generic (eg. "National Organisation for Women" is allowed). |
Random quote: "Sometimes it is said that man cannot be trusted with the government of himself. Can he, then, be trusted with the government of others?" - Thomas Jefferson |