Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5475
Next month in: 00:56:06
Server time: 15:03:53, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Dx6743 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: In-vitro liberalisation

Details

Submitted by[?]: Social Democrats & Pirates

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 4499

Description[?]:

We believe that marriage should not be a factor in deciding whether an in-vitro procedure is legitamite, but instead a biological fitness check-up.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date07:26:56, December 13, 2018 CET
FromGrár af Tælmörk (The Gray of Telamon)
ToDebating the In-vitro liberalisation
MessageNo marriage, no children. This one is very simple. We can let every woman run with a child in their womb. A child needs protection, shelter and a healthy relationship between a mother and a father. Children born without a proper family, studies show that tend to be psychopaths and criminals. Do you want a world full of unmarried mothers and children with mental issues?
Minister of Health and Social Services
Emil Steinsson

Date09:52:41, December 13, 2018 CET
FromSocial Democrats & Pirates
ToDebating the In-vitro liberalisation
MessageThe minister of Health and Social services is clearly misleading the public with illegitamite data. Studies have shown that children in civic union show no difference in behaviour or performance compared to nuclear families. Therefore Mr. Steinsson has no ground to argue. What we do however have to discuss is about all the families that are not married - there are ever more couples that have children without marrying. The same principle should be applied for IVF and can in fact be seen as an economic opportunity, because people from other countries would flock to us.

But of course, the government wants you to shut your mouth and eyes and be complacent with medieval values - we profoundly oppose and give unmarried couples the dream they've had for so long.

Let's remove this silly government, vote SD!
-Erisa Kristfinnursdottir SD

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 0

no
 

Total Seats: 83

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: If there are no parties in your nation with seats, feel free to visit the forum and request an early election on the Early Election Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4362

    Random quote: "We're the first society in history with the option of living in a world without poverty. The fact poverty still exist says more about our political leaders than I can." - Clint Borgen

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 48