Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5477
Next month in: 03:15:53
Server time: 20:44:06, May 01, 2024 CET
Currently online (6): albaniansunited | Liukazu | lulus | Paulo Nogueira | Sevenberry | ZulanALD | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: economics reforms

Details

Submitted by[?]: Nouveau Parti Libéral

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 4503

Description[?]:

Projet de loi présenté par la Porte parole du Nouveau Parti Libéral en matière d'Économie : Diamante Simard

I propose to formally legalize private ownership in minor industries, to make our law more precise, Currently, we allow Private healthcare, private schools and private nursery with one laws, but this law forbid it. We also note that as long as an industries is run by a democratic workers council, its in the hands of the working class. does not matter if private or public.
I also propose to legalize the rights to work of foreigners, as socialist should not be something that belong to Alduria (Canrille only)

Finally, I propose to nationalize prostitution, because its a work where girls (mostly) offend tend to depend on a pimp for their security. We would prefer to see the police assuring the security of escorts, rather then some greedy pimps.

By Diamante Simard

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:19:48, December 19, 2018 CET
FromParti Socialiste Républicain d'Aldurie
ToDebating the economics reforms
MessageWe support article 3, but oppose articles 1 and 2.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 96

no
   

Total Seats: 404

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

Random quote: "In all recorded history there has not been one economist who has had to worry about where the next meal would come from." - Peter Drucker

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 52