We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Justice Reform Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Lodamun Democratic Alliance
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 4503
Description[?]:
| We will leave this bill to the floor for discussion |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's position towards the administration of law.
Old value:: There is a uniform system of courts across the nation.
Current: There are regional courts that have jurisdiction over questions of regional law and national courts that have jurisdiction over questions of national law.
Proposed: There are regional courts, but decisions of regional courts may be appealed to national courts (if the right to appeal exists).
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Ownership of guns by private individuals.
Old value:: Individuals are allowed to own firearms as long as they do not have a history of dangerous mental illness or a violent criminality.
Current: Adult individuals may own guns under strict license conditions.
Proposed: Adult individuals may own guns under strict license conditions.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy with respect to polygamy.
Old value:: Polygamous marriages are accorded equal recognition to monogamous marriages.
Current: Polygamous marriages are accorded equal recognition to monogamous marriages.
Proposed: The government does not recognise polygamous relationships.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:29:04, December 20, 2018 CET | From | the people's party | To | Debating the Justice Reform Bill |
| Message | I agree with all the article's made by this bill you have my vote |
| Date | 20:50:05, December 20, 2018 CET | From | Grand Nationalist Fraction | To | Debating the Justice Reform Bill |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, we could discuss this bill. But some articles aren't even worth arguing. LWA believes letting criminals vote would send a wrong message to the citizens, concerning rights and all. We do indeed believe that some parties might indeed gain some votes if this law were to be changed. What we cannot accept is the change in our judiciary system. We hardly can find the time and money to fund our Justice Department as it is. Therefore, under the current circumstances, we cannot change that system at all. Mercedes Verhoord Minister of Finance |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 59 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 120 |
| Random fact: "Spamming", or the indiscriminate posting of unsolicited messages, is not allowed. |
| Random quote: "I am interested in politics so that one day I will not have to be interested in politics." - Ayn Rand |