Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5471
Next month in: 03:25:02
Server time: 12:34:57, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): burgerboys | Xalvas | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: OOC: Name Change to conform to rules

Details

Submitted by[?]: Factio Imperatoria

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 4526

Description[?]:

As per http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4361&start=3650#p146183 we need to change the name of the country to:

Res Publica Democratica Pontesiae (Pontesi)

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 150

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
     

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Whilst the use of non-English languages can be appropriate for nation names, party names, constitutional titles and other variables, English is the official language of communication in the game. All descriptive texts and public communications should be in English or at least appear alongside a full English translation.

    Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia)

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 31