Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5461
Next month in: 01:17:56
Server time: 18:42:03, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): Arusu-Weareback | hexaus18 | hexaus19 | HopesFor | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Supreme court of Rutania

Details

Submitted by[?]: Rutanian National Congress Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 4789

Description[?]:

This will be the Highest court of Rutania which will neutrally operate under Justice Department it will not be governed by any party or Orgnization i open the debate for further suggestions in establishing a court

i believe that if some parties find some corruption or something wrong done by other parties or any organization or breaking RP Rules then anyone can appeal to supreme court for hearing here is the procedure of requesting for hearing
1 find suspect or some party doing something wrong or breaking rules
2 Raise the issue and demand answer in assembly if not answered then go to step 3
3 propose a bill to request to put charges against the suspect and to start hearing
If the bill passes then a court hearing would be set up by justice department with neutral judges
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Article 1
The amount needed of vote should be at least half of the legislature*
*exceptions made if other parties do not vote, general afk or just simply missing seats
Article 2
If article 1 was pursued, the suspect will be judged, both parties may appeal
Article 3
Depends on case, could be a prevention from the Cabinet , changing party name acting like reform, arresting persons etc. This can be decided by other parties based on a bill with over half of legislature, if no agreement, the court should roll its opinion.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date02:26:34, February 23, 2019 CET
From Democratic Change Movement
ToDebating the Supreme court of Rutania
MessageI agree on creating Supreme Courts.But,Its lack of detail and I'll help you with that.

Date02:38:35, February 23, 2019 CET
From Rutanian National Congress Party
ToDebating the Supreme court of Rutania
Messagethanks i will appreciate that we need to set punishments and rules

Date06:26:12, February 23, 2019 CET
From Independent Freedom Alliance
ToDebating the Supreme court of Rutania
MessageWe agree.

Date12:35:00, February 23, 2019 CET
From People's League of Rutania
ToDebating the Supreme court of Rutania
Messagei also agree

Date13:03:43, February 23, 2019 CET
From National Liberal Party
ToDebating the Supreme court of Rutania
MessageAgree

Date14:58:06, February 23, 2019 CET
From Rutanian Democrat Party
ToDebating the Supreme court of Rutania
Messagei also agree i will add some thiings in this

Date18:42:16, February 23, 2019 CET
From National Liberal Party
ToDebating the Supreme court of Rutania
MessageSo I have ideas:
Article 1
The amount needed of vote should be at least half of the legislature*
*exceptions made if other parties do not vote, general afk or just simply missing seats
*if other parties opppose the seizing of a party reasons should be forwarded with proves why, as to ensure viable reasons
HOWEVER this would block the law as such, this can be overriden if the situation is extreme, national security, corruption or other grave offences (crime, terrorism etc)
Article 2
Firstly, before seizing suspects, all parties can send their own inspectors to inspect, if deemed something obvious, a party can call the higher court to review the situation, both parties can present evidence pro or against
If article 1 was pursued, the suspect will be judged, both parties may appeal
Article 3
Depends on case, could be a prevention from the Cabinet , changing party name acting like reform, arresting persons etc. This can be decided by other parties based on a bill with over half of legislature, if no agreement, the court should roll its opinion.

Date21:40:49, February 23, 2019 CET
From Rutanian National Congress Party
ToDebating the Supreme court of Rutania
Messageagree it will be looked upon

Date16:39:02, February 24, 2019 CET
From Hosian Democratic party of Rutania
ToDebating the Supreme court of Rutania
MessageVeronica Roberts the justice minister will declare the results of accusation bills according to the votes.

Date07:13:31, February 25, 2019 CET
From Rutanian National Congress Party
ToDebating the Supreme court of Rutania
Messageyes the justice minister will have the power to declare votes

Date04:16:18, October 26, 2019 CET
From Moderation
ToDebating the Supreme court of Rutania
MessageOOC: Archiving.

Date18:34:48, July 22, 2020 CET
From Moderation
ToDebating the Supreme court of Rutania
MessageOOC: Archiving.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 324

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
       

    Total Seats: 176


    Random fact: In your Message Centre there is a really useful feature which allows you to subscribe to all of the bill debates in your nation. If you use that, then the "Watched Discussions" section will show you every time a new message has been posted on a bill. You can also subscribe to other pages you want to follow, such as your nation message-board, party organisations or bills outside your nation which you are interested in.

    Random quote: "Politicians are the same all over. They promise to build a bridge even where there is no river." Nikita Khrushchev (1894 - 1971)

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 83