We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Third Judicial Reform
Details
Submitted by[?]: National Liberal Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 4537
Description[?]:
| A reform to protect citizens rights to property. Leave opinion down below |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Police searches.
Old value:: The police cannot search a person or their property without their consent unless the police have obtained a warrant from a court or have reasonable grounds to suspect that a crime was committed.
Current: The police cannot search a person or their property without their consent unless the police have obtained a warrant from a court or in cases of imminent danger.
Proposed: The police cannot search a person or their property without their consent unless the police have obtained a warrant from a court.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 01:44:00, February 26, 2019 CET | From |  Democratic Change Movement | To | Debating the Third Judicial Reform |
| Message | "have reasonable grounds to suspect that a crime was committed." What if Terrorist is in the house and police needs to search their property.? |
| Date | 01:45:07, February 26, 2019 CET | From | Democratic Change Movement | To | Debating the Third Judicial Reform |
| Message | Terrorist don't have any legal right and freedom because they don't have any right since they spread fear and teror destroyed other people freedoms. |
| Date | 15:38:06, February 26, 2019 CET | From | National Liberal Party | To | Debating the Third Judicial Reform |
| Message | Nope. We stand firmly to protect people's homes. Everyone has a right to a trial before their goods are seized up or them. This is not good to the democratic process of our people living their life. Police should respect trial by jury laws just like others. Why police should be entitled to seize properties without due process. I think we need a due process to make sure no tyranny is let to grown. We hereby declare this a needed feature to improve the freedoms of the people to self defense against the tyranny, or do you like a police-state?? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 289 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 119 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 342 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "All history has been a history of class struggles between dominated classes at various stages of social development." - Friedrich Engels |