We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Anti "Big-reforms" act 4536
Details
Submitted by[?]: Hosian Democratic party of Rutania
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 4537
Description[?]:
| A recent problem in Rutanian politics is the appearance of bills including a big sum of law changes, which decrease the stability of Rutania as citizens need time to learn and fit these new laws. Our solution is to regulate the maximum proposals and proposals received by parties. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The maximum proposal quota a party can accumulate.
Old value:: 10
Current: 20
Proposed: 5
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The number of proposals a party can introduce per year (will be handed out as a monthly quota).
Old value:: 12
Current: 20
Proposed: 3
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:43:15, February 25, 2019 CET | From | National Liberal Party | To | Debating the Anti "Big-reforms" act 4536 |
| Message | Could you put a more round number . 6? is good enough |
| Date | 19:43:24, February 25, 2019 CET | From | National Liberal Party | To | Debating the Anti "Big-reforms" act 4536 |
| Message | I may agree if you put six |
| Date | 19:43:51, February 25, 2019 CET | From | National Liberal Party | To | Debating the Anti "Big-reforms" act 4536 |
| Message | To be roundly, 6 is divisible with 24 perfectly, 4 quota a day. Pls, Beg you if you want a chance with me. 6 or nothing. |
| Date | 19:44:23, February 25, 2019 CET | From | National Liberal Party | To | Debating the Anti "Big-reforms" act 4536 |
| Message | And why do not recall your bill Anti-Spam bill, or you do not like cursed names |
| Date | 20:42:07, February 25, 2019 CET | From | Hosian Democratic party of Rutania | To | Debating the Anti "Big-reforms" act 4536 |
| Message | We do not always use same names over and over again. |
| Date | 07:05:34, February 26, 2019 CET | From | Independent Freedom Alliance | To | Debating the Anti "Big-reforms" act 4536 |
| Message | The current situation is already quite reasonable. |
| Date | 08:32:48, February 26, 2019 CET | From | People's League of Rutania | To | Debating the Anti "Big-reforms" act 4536 |
| Message | we belive changes should be made but not this much drastic |
| Date | 15:35:21, February 26, 2019 CET | From | National Liberal Party | To | Debating the Anti "Big-reforms" act 4536 |
| Message | 6 as quota per year is an acceptable compromise, also we should not limit the ammount we can accumulate, that is dumb. The number is already ok and not bad. What however should be lowered is the 12 quota per year to just six. Six gives us 3 quota per year, think is enough, 6 is too much per year. So 6 is a middle roads thinker. We need to compromise and not flat out eliminate democratic process. |
| Date | 15:43:20, February 26, 2019 CET | From | National Liberal Party | To | Debating the Anti "Big-reforms" act 4536 |
| Message | RNCP, please think twice before voting this, better to compromise than let HDpR block the democratic process. What about a balance, we agree with HDpR to limit the quota but at least a normal number, 6 or something near it, we cannot just outhright force a small number, we shall compromise if HDpR is opened enough to compromise, we are opened to discussion and change on this bill, however just flat out pushing a small quota is not the solution... |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes | Total Seats: 210 | ||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 440 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 100 |
| Random fact: Check out the forum regularly for game news. http://forum.particracy.net/ |
| Random quote: "Cruel leaders are replaced only to have new leaders turn cruel." - Ernesto "Che" Guevara |