We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Militairy Reform
Details
Submitted by[?]: Progressive Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 4557
Description[?]:
| . |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of nuclear weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare.
Current: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare.
Proposed: The nation reserves the right to nuclear weapons in retaliation to a nuclear, chemical or biological attack.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The policy with respect to nuclear weaponry.
Old value:: The nation shall never develop, produce or store nuclear weaponry.
Current: The nation shall never produce or store nuclear weaponry for military purposes. Research and development of the technology is permitted.
Proposed: The nation reserves the right to develop, produce and store nuclear arms.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:45:06, April 07, 2019 CET | From |  Progressive Party | To | Debating the Militairy Reform |
| Message | This bill shows the world that we're not to mess with. This doesn't mean that we're going to use such weaponry. But by letting the world know that we aren't obstructed by our laws to use those weapons will let other countries think before they attack us. |
| Date | 22:55:02, April 07, 2019 CET | From | Humanist Party | To | Debating the Militairy Reform |
| Message | The construction of such weaponry is not only expensive, but it also poses a possible risk to safety. The upkeep of these weapons will drain funds from other areas and if there is a breach in safety the release of nuclear materials would be hazardous to health. The only way a nuclear deterrent would work would be if we faced an imminent nuclear attack, by which time it would be far too late to retaliate at all. We understand your reasoning, it is admirable to wish to secure the safety of our people, however we do not feel we are able to support this bill. W. Bowman. Leader of The Humanist Party. |
| Date | 23:33:14, April 07, 2019 CET | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the Militairy Reform |
| Message | We find it ridiculous that a progressive party wants research in nuclear weaponry. Also, if we get in a nuclear war situation, the apocalypse will be upon us. Negotiations and peace should be our response to avoid escalation. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 256 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 109 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Never use the same password as a friend. If two or more active accounts use the same password, they will be inactivated. |
| Random quote: "The right to suffer is one of the joys of a free economy." - Howard Pyle (commenting on unemployment in Detroit) |