We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Private Cars, What A Distant Dream
Details
Submitted by[?]: Capitalizt Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2206
Description[?]:
| ... that can become reality soon. Recognizing that forcing people to travel collective by forbidding them to have more than one car, recognizing that it is not just a moral but also an economical failure, we ask for a more human policy that _encourages_ and not _forces_ people to travel collective. Give people freedom to choose. If they are forced to have more than one car being a numerous familiy, or they just want more than one car for whatever reason, why can't they? All but living in a country where possessing a 'polluting' car is against the law. Changes won't be radical as the abovementioned encouragements will keep things changing slowly, in a manner the system can easily adapt to a new transport compliance. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning private cars.
Old value:: Only cars using environmentally friendly fuels are allowed.
Current: Only cars using environmentally friendly fuels are allowed.
Proposed: Private cars are allowed, but people are encouraged to travel collective and tax incentives are provided for cars using environmentally friendly fuels.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:37:00, March 26, 2006 CET | From | We Say So! Party | To | Debating the Private Cars, What A Distant Dream |
| Message | We fail to see any necessary reason for change. The current law allows the ownership of numerous cars whilst also guaranteeing the ecological safety of our Country. All this bill does is allow for an increase in pollution in the name of "freedom" which is a poor argument as they already have the freedom to own as many vehicles as they wish without the adverse effects inherent in allowing high polluting vehicles. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 93 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 244 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 63 |
| Random fact: RP laws follow the same passing rules as in-game variable laws. Laws that are not of a constitutional nature require a simple majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. Laws that are of a constitutional nature require a 2/3 majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. RP laws may be abolished a simple majority vote this applies to ANY RP law. |
| Random quote: "Since when did you care about women?" - Faith Chiang, former Gaduri politician |