Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5472
Next month in: 02:28:28
Server time: 05:31:31, April 20, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Local Control of Agriculture Act 2005

Details

Submitted by[?]: Centre Démocratique

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2208

Description[?]:

To localize agricultural subsidy policy.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date20:28:21, March 27, 2006 CET
From Free Conservative Party
ToDebating the Local Control of Agriculture Act 2005
MessageI would prefer no subsidization.

Date23:13:33, March 27, 2006 CET
From Centre Démocratique
ToDebating the Local Control of Agriculture Act 2005
MessageWhy let the federal government have a monopoly on agricultural subsidy policy. Let local government decide what is best for their region.

Date00:29:16, March 28, 2006 CET
From Free Conservative Party
ToDebating the Local Control of Agriculture Act 2005
MessageThe federal government is made up of local governments, so it really does not matter.

Date00:31:12, March 28, 2006 CET
From Free Conservative Party
ToDebating the Local Control of Agriculture Act 2005
MessageThe US tried letting states do what they would in the 1700s when the US was a Fedaration. There was no unity in the United States.
It did not work at all.

Date17:27:55, March 31, 2006 CET
From Jelbék Zemojad Lofrkad Prta
ToDebating the Local Control of Agriculture Act 2005
MessageThis is dangerous. Although it is important for local authorities to have control over issues which are less important on a national scale, Agriculture is. To ensure we produce the correct export crops and provide the right crops for consumption within our own nation, central control of subsidies is essential.

Date20:02:06, March 31, 2006 CET
From Centre Démocratique
ToDebating the Local Control of Agriculture Act 2005
MessageTo the Conservatives: We are aware you prefer no subsidization, but why allow the federal government to have a monopoly on this issue?

To DLP: We believe that local regions are more knowledgable about their agriculture and therefore better equipped to make policy in that area.

Most importantly, the Citizens Party believes that we must decentralize public policy to make decision-making closer to the average person in Jelbania. If all decisions are made in the capital, then politics and government became more alien and distant. Localized government is true democracy.

Date20:22:17, March 31, 2006 CET
From Jelbék Zemojad Lofrkad Prta
ToDebating the Local Control of Agriculture Act 2005
MessageAgreed, devolution is essential.

Devolution ought to be controlled. Excessive devolution is dangerous. There is no use in governing a state that is not a state.

The DLP has considered this issue with its local party organisations, however, and has decided to support it.

Date20:57:47, March 31, 2006 CET
From Free Conservative Party
ToDebating the Local Control of Agriculture Act 2005
MessageDLP: The people should decide what what is good for the people. PEOPLE ARE NOT STUPID.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 189

no
  

Total Seats: 157

abstain
     

Total Seats: 155


Random fact: Party organizations are eligible for deletion if they are over 50 in-game years old, do not have at least 1 active member or are historically significant and possess historically significant information.

Random quote: "It all came from there." - Lech Walesa (pointing to a TV when a reporter asked him why communism fell)

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 59