Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5460
Next month in: 01:21:26
Server time: 14:38:33, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): MyungLuth | SE33 | Spiguer | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Democracy For All, Not For Some

Details

Submitted by[?]: Sanctaphrax Party (Mod)

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill requests an early election. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline. Elections will be held immediately if the bill passes.

Voting deadline: October 2065

Description[?]:

We, the Sanctaphrax Party (Mod), call for early elections as soon as we can reach a consensus.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:59:25, June 09, 2005 CET
From First Socialist Party
ToDebating the Democracy For All, Not For Some
MessageThats your last veto if I counted right.

Date08:05:37, June 10, 2005 CET
From Sanctaphrax Party (Mod)
ToDebating the Democracy For All, Not For Some
MessageYes, yes it is. And why exactly do you oppose it? Democracy not appeal to you?

Date08:17:35, June 10, 2005 CET
From Kellarly Party
ToDebating the Democracy For All, Not For Some
MessageIts got my backing.

Date11:09:05, June 10, 2005 CET
From First Socialist Party
ToDebating the Democracy For All, Not For Some
MessageI'm curious, why are you proposing it? Why make my term short when the Socialist Party is the most backed party ever? What have I done wrong this term? Have I not righted the wrongs of my predecessor? Especially when there would be an election 2 months after this bill passes anyway.

I think you should justify yourself before anyone votes yes.

And I am disappointed with the Kellarly and Christian Liberal parties.

The only saving grace is that there is no way this bill could possibly pass without the Ruthlessly Random Party.

Date11:10:54, June 10, 2005 CET
From Kellarly Party
ToDebating the Democracy For All, Not For Some
MessageYou needn't be dissappointed, you will only lose 2 months of rule. Its not like its a massive blow.

Date11:48:48, June 10, 2005 CET
From First Socialist Party
ToDebating the Democracy For All, Not For Some
MessageThen why bother?

Date11:52:26, June 10, 2005 CET
From Kellarly Party
ToDebating the Democracy For All, Not For Some
MessageBecause the people love democracy...

OOC: and i don't want to abstain...

Date12:08:58, June 10, 2005 CET
From First Socialist Party
ToDebating the Democracy For All, Not For Some
MessageOOC: Then just vote no!

IC: Yes, and they voted me in for 3.5 years. You are taking that away. The people don't want early elections, Sanctaphrax does.

Date14:34:18, June 10, 2005 CET
From Kellarly Party
ToDebating the Democracy For All, Not For Some
MessageHmmmm, very well, I will change my vote, but only for these reasons, this bill will not pass without RRP, who has voted the other way and the election is only 2 months after this voting deadline, so it won't make much difference anyway.

Date15:02:37, June 10, 2005 CET
From First Socialist Party
ToDebating the Democracy For All, Not For Some
MessageAre you sure you are voting the other way purely because you do not want to lose?

Date16:15:12, June 10, 2005 CET
From Kellarly Party
ToDebating the Democracy For All, Not For Some
MessageI think it will make little difference either way. I'm not in the running to win the election so its virtually a non vote anyhow.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 51

no
    

Total Seats: 114

abstain
 

Total Seats: 21


Random fact: If there are no parties in your nation with seats, feel free to visit the forum and request an early election on the Early Election Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4362

Random quote: "Abortion is inherently different from other medical procedures because no other procedure involves the purposeful termination of a potential life." - Potter Stewart

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 57