Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5475
Next month in: 03:39:17
Server time: 04:20:42, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of October 4588

Details

Submitted by[?]: Dark Templar (LL)

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 4590

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date10:16:30, June 10, 2019 CET
From Social Democratic Party of Havu
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 4588
MessageWe respect the decision of the Dark Templar of incirporating us in the Cabinet, although a previous resolution had directed the SDP not to partake in its functioning. The change in leadership means a change in policy also. We contemplated and arrived that contribution requires active participation,which the DT has offered. We are, moreover, overwhelmed by the fraction of the Cabinet allotted to us, which is indicative of the belief the DT and the populace has on us. We would happily agree to this Cabinet but present the following queries:
(1) What has caused the DT not to incorporate the 3demands party into this Cabinet, since it is highly probable that its exclusion may cause the bill to be defeated? Also, people voted fanatically for the party, so at least one ministry should be provided to the 3demands, this is our stance.
(2) Given that Ikradon is inherently socialist in nature, what has caused DT not to include the Metzist Party in the Cabinet, since that would imply unity and cohesion? We are willing to abrogate any position offered to us for the sake of unity in the Cabinet.
Having said so, we welcome this proposal, and assure the NA that we shall perform the functions delegates to us to the best of our capacities.
Thanking you,
Rodrick Guerrero,
General Secretary, SDPoH.

Date14:02:57, June 10, 2019 CET
From Social Democratic Party of Havu
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 4588
MessageWe hope that all our queries and doubts will be answered and dispelled.

Date22:13:16, June 10, 2019 CET
From Dark Templar (LL)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 4588
MessageWe refused to work with 3demands because it is a right wing party, however both parties are not longer sitting in the National Assembly.

Date12:22:27, June 11, 2019 CET
From Social Democratic Party of Havu
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 4588
MessageWe understand and respect the DT's stance.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 307

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain

      Total Seats: 0


      Random fact: Moderation will not implement nation renaming requests where the proposed name does not comply with the requirements set out in the Nation Renaming Guide: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6364

      Random quote: "The reason there are so few female politicians is that it is too much trouble to put makeup on two faces." - Maureen Murphy

      This page was generated with PHP
      Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
      Queries performed: 50