We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Army Autonomy Act II
Details
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 4604
Description[?]:
Struck down the provisions regarding the biological and chemical weapons from the original. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy towards the use of land mines by the army.
Old value:: The use of land mines is allowed but restricted.
Current: The use of land mines is prohibited.
Proposed: The Government leaves this to the army to decide upon.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Appointment of military officers
Old value:: Military officers are only appointed through battlefield commission.
Current: The Ministry of Defense is authorized to appoint military officers.
Proposed: The Ministry of Defense is authorized to appoint military officers.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding the treatment of prisoners of war.
Old value:: Prisoners of war must be treated well, according to internationally-accepted standards.
Current: Prisoners of war are immediately returned to their own government.
Proposed: Prisoners of war are treated according to the national laws of the captor power.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 11:22:21, July 10, 2019 CET | From | NLP | To | Debating the Army Autonomy Act II |
Message | Reasoning for each of these laws: Land Mines - the professionals in the military know how to utilize them far more than us politicians. By legislating their use, we not only endanger our chances of victory and the lives of our soldiers, but also the lives of the civilian or allied population of the opposing side, due to incompetent use. The military will know how to employ them better than we ever will. Appointment of Military Officers - This one is obvious - a battlefield commission system literally means that ranks of command are purchased. This means that promotion in the military is less so about merit on the battlefield, but rather more about one's socio-economic class. This not only weakens our command structure (since it is not merit based), threatening our chances of victory, but also makes our army more mistake-prone - thereby leading to more Gaduri casualties. This law must be changed. The Minister of Defense would be a good start to reform in how the military officer corps functions. Treatment of Prisoners of War - In all instances in which this applies, we are the captor power, treating enemy prisoners of war. I would argue that the Gaduri standard towards POWs is far more humane than the "internationally-accepted standards". For example, many nations still have the death penalty, and many nations still have instances wherein torture is legal. By the law of the captor power (or the Federal Union of Gaduridos, in other words) means that POWs would likely be treated in a more humane fashion, simply because Gaduri law regarding the treatment of prisoners exceeds in quality as when compared to the international law. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||||
yes |
Total Seats: 250 | |||||||
no | Total Seats: 0 | |||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Role-play is most enjoyable and successful when there is good communication and friendly relations between all players involved. |
Random quote: "We here thank those in Deltaria who put [Zardic spy Mona Rivet] to justice in the most humane way possible. With bullets." - Sergio Rodriguez, former Egelian journalist |