We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Federal Civil Defence Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: One Nation Socialist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2216
Description[?]:
| Federalaising Civil defence to give each local government the power to do what is right for the are under their jurisdiction. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Civil defence is the government's policy on providing shelters to be used in the event of attacks on major cities, mainly nuclear attacks and bombing.
Old value:: Every public building is required to feature provisions for civil defence and at least 50% of spaces must be allocated to private citizens.
Current: The government builds and maintains a network of shelters across the nation.
Proposed: Local authorities are responsible for building and maintaining shelters.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 14:54:36, April 03, 2006 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Federal Civil Defence Bill |
| Message | Are you insane? No! Absolutely not. We most definitely oppose. |
| Date | 17:56:47, April 03, 2006 CET | From | Social-Conservative party | To | Debating the Federal Civil Defence Bill |
| Message | We feel that the central government should take care of this. We oppose |
| Date | 19:20:55, April 03, 2006 CET | From | Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Federal Civil Defence Bill |
| Message | We can agree to that.. |
| Date | 21:41:18, April 03, 2006 CET | From | Atlas | To | Debating the Federal Civil Defence Bill |
| Message | No money for doomsday scenarios. The actual risk on having a nuclear war is zero. If at any time there is a real risk then let's make sure we have the ability to strike first or let us get into an alliance that is dominant. No publicly funded shelters would be the best option. Delocalization is closer to our position than the actual value so we support. |
| Date | 16:42:55, April 08, 2006 CET | From | Patriot Party | To | Debating the Federal Civil Defence Bill |
| Message | umm yea. We'll oppose this measure as this is key to defending our civilians. |
| Date | 15:06:56, April 10, 2006 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Federal Civil Defence Bill |
| Message | Move to a vote please. |
| Date | 18:39:55, April 10, 2006 CET | From | Social-Conservative party | To | Debating the Federal Civil Defence Bill |
| Message | Vote please ? |
| Date | 18:19:15, April 13, 2006 CET | From | Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Federal Civil Defence Bill |
| Message | ONCP said to me he'ld be be away this week.. |
| Date | 23:01:52, April 13, 2006 CET | From | Patriot Party | To | Debating the Federal Civil Defence Bill |
| Message | figures. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 247 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 183 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 69 |
| Random fact: The influence a bill has on elections decreases over time, until it eventually is no longer relevant. This can explain shifts in your party's position to the electorate and your visibility. |
| Random quote: "The truly powerful feed ideology to the masses like fast food while they dine on the most rarified delicacy of all: impunity." - Naomi Klein |