We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Arms Industry Regulations Act 4656
Details
Submitted by[?]: Dynamocratic Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 4657
Description[?]:
| The deregulation of the Rutanian arms industry to allow for some private ownership. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's defence industry.
Old value:: The state owns all defence industries.
Current: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Proposed: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 10:57:38, October 29, 2019 CET | From | Dynamocratic Party | To | Debating the Arms Industry Regulations Act 4656 |
| Message | Not only will this bill allow for a leaner approach to military procurement by ensuring competitive efficiencies are introduced. |
| Date | 11:01:29, October 29, 2019 CET | From | Most Noble Order of Stag | To | Debating the Arms Industry Regulations Act 4656 |
| Message | MR Speaker, upon consultation with the Secretary of State for Defence (Lt Gen. Robert Mathews COS RE (CSP)), my party have done further research into this matter through the usual channels of the Home Office, and from that research which can be published to party leaders if requested we have decided that this would be detrimental to the current state of peace in the Nation. if this bill is past we will be seeking to implement a select committee to review the legality of this against the current Constitution. For this reason, the CSP will be voting against this bill. Signed DCC Shannon Murray MP LL.M BLe. Secretary of State for the Home Department Chief Commissioner of the Rutanian Police Deputy Leader of the Constitutional Solidarity Party Lt Col. Robert Mathews MP COS RE Secretary of State for Defence Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces Party Chief of Staff |
| Date | 11:02:53, October 29, 2019 CET | From | Most Noble Order of Stag | To | Debating the Arms Industry Regulations Act 4656 |
| Message | Following that Statment from the CSP, I would like to invite the Dynamocratic Party to respond to the CSPs comments on the bill. thank you Signed The Right Honourable Mr James McVey MP LL.D MPM RC Speaker of the House of Peers |
| Date | 17:16:26, October 29, 2019 CET | From | Dynamocratic Party | To | Debating the Arms Industry Regulations Act 4656 |
| Message | Mr Speaker, I would be interested to see such research as I cannot foresee any element of this bill that would in any way affect the current state of peace. The measure allows merely for private sector involvement in our arms procurement in order to improve efficiencies and increase the operational effectiveness of armed forces by making extra budget available to programs of technological advance. Such increased effectiveness would surely be helpful in maintaining the state of peace in this nation as opposed to undermining it. I hope the sanity of this argument will persuade the house. Signed Bertram Wilberforce Wooster Leader of the Dynamocratic Party |
| Date | 17:45:25, October 29, 2019 CET | From | Most Noble Order of Stag | To | Debating the Arms Industry Regulations Act 4656 |
| Message | Mr Speaker, I would firstly like to thank my Honourable Friend, the Secretary of State for the Home Department, for her eloquent opening of our debate and to the Secretary of State for Defence for his departments research however given the seriousness of this debate I have seen it fit to take over at this point. Mr Speaker, I would like to also thank my friend, the Leader of the Dynamocratic Party, for his respectful response to the Honourable member's opening statement. I would like to inform him that all research is available through the private conversation function of the house. if he wishes to visit me in my office I will happily discuss this research with him. however for the benefit of you, Mr Speaker, and other members of the house, I am happy to summarise the outcomes of our research. Mr Speaker, I am happy to present and summarise the data collated by the Ministry of Defence and the Home Office which was produced with the supervision of my own department (the Cabinet Office). this data surmises that if private Defence Industries are allowed to grow they can become a danger and without a strict policing and structure with close observation and restriction can grow out of control. The administrative function of policing is more than is currently generated with the current Defence System. Thank you for allowing me to address the house, Mr Speaker. I look forward to hearing from the Leader of the Dynamocratic Party Signed The Right Honourable Jack Simms MP LL.D DPM RC First Secretary of State Leader of the Constitutional Solidarity Party |
| Date | 17:59:28, October 29, 2019 CET | From | Dynamocratic Party | To | Debating the Arms Industry Regulations Act 4656 |
| Message | Mr Speaker, I am grateful to the First Secretary of State for his response. I cannot confess to be entirely satisfied with his answer, however, or with the research for which he provides evidence. As such private industries do not currently exist, on what basis was the research conducted and against what measures were these assumptions made? The degree to which the administrative burden of policing this sector renders its competitive advantages unsatisfactory must surely dependent on the degree to which we roll-out a privatisation program. The provisions of this bill are minimal in this respect and allow plenty of scope for testing and analysis of the policy. I am thus of the opinion that the house should continue to pass this provision. Signed, Bertram Wilberforce Wooster, Leader of the Dynamocratic Party |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 336 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 414 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "Any law which violates the inalienable rights of man is essentially unjust and tyrannical; it is not a law at all." - Maximilien Robespierre |