Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5475
Next month in: 02:31:10
Server time: 01:28:49, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): itsjustgav | R Drax | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Speaker Election

Details

Submitted by[?]: Conservative Republican Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 4682

Description[?]:

No one party has more than 50% of the seats therefore we must elect a speaker, the top two parties are The Socialist Workers Party and the Conservative Republican Party.

Vote YES to give the speakership to the Socialist Workers party.
Vote No to give the speakership to the Conservative Republican Party.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:08:13, December 19, 2019 CET
FromConservative Republican Party
ToDebating the Speaker Election
MessageThe Conservative Republican candidate is Phillip Virgil.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 271

no
  

Total Seats: 149

abstain
 

Total Seats: 122


Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

Random quote: "Those who are responsible for the national security must be the sole judges of what the national security requires. It would be obviously undesirable that such matters should be made the subject of evidence in a court of law or otherwise discussed in public." - Unattributed member of the the House of Lords on the removal of trade union rights

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 37