We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Food Deregulation Act Continued
Details
Submitted by[?]: Dorvish Popular Front
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2212
Description[?]:
These were supposed to be in the first Act, similar vein. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Listing of controversial ingredients, such as genetically modified (GM) ingredients (if food labelling is applied).
Old value:: Any chemicals used in agrigulture or processing, and any GM ingredients must be listed.
Current: Any chemicals used in agrigulture or processing, and any GM ingredients must be listed.
Proposed: There is no requirement to disclose GM ingredients, or chemicals used in agrigulture or processing.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Food safety policy.
Old value:: The government introduces, and actively enforces, food standards provisions.
Current: The government introduces, and actively enforces, food standards provisions.
Proposed: There are no food standards provisions.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Licensing of food sales.
Old value:: Anyone may sell food, but shelf lives of foods are enforced.
Current: Food may be sold by licensed vendors only.
Proposed: The sale of food is unregulated.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 04:24:48, April 07, 2006 CET | From | Maroon Party | To | Debating the Food Deregulation Act Continued |
Message | We support 2 and 3, but not 1. We will vote down this bill for the moment. |
Date | 11:34:22, April 07, 2006 CET | From | National Conservative Conference | To | Debating the Food Deregulation Act Continued |
Message | We also disagree slightly with article one, but this is not enough to stop us voting against. We will vote yes. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes | Total Seats: 86 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 113 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
Random quote: "He who wishes to be obeyed must know how to command." - Niccolo Machiavelli |