We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: P.d.I.4/4696. Military Doctrine Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Ordine, Fede e Famiglia
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 4697
Description[?]:
| Mario Constella (MoA), OFF spokesman on Defence: To increase the defensive capabilities of our Imperrial Armed Forces. Besides, more people have to contribute to the forces to strengthen te forces. Thank you. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning biological and chemical weaponry.
Old value:: The nation shall never purchase, produce, or store biological or chemical weaponry, for military purposes. Research and development of the technology is permitted.
Current: The nation reserves the right to develop, construct and store biological and chemical weapons.
Proposed: The nation reserves the right to develop, construct and store biological and chemical weapons.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of chemical and biological weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weaponry in warfare.
Current: The nation reserves the right to use chemical or biological weapons in warfare for any reason.
Proposed: The nation reserves the right to use chemical or biological weapons in warfare for any reason.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy towards civilians who conscientiously object to being required to perform military service (if applicable).
Old value:: Conscientious objectors are exempted.
Current: Conscientious objectors can be exempted, but only on religious grounds.
Proposed: Conscientious objectors can be exempted, but only on religious grounds.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 15:15:56, January 16, 2020 CET | From | Res Publica (RP) | To | Debating the P.d.I.4/4696. Military Doctrine Act |
| Message | "We would like to hear the arguments for article 2 regarding the use of chemical and biological weapons" Tullio Gotti RP spokesman for defence |
| Date | 06:58:58, January 17, 2020 CET | From | Ordine, Fede e Famiglia | To | Debating the P.d.I.4/4696. Military Doctrine Act |
| Message | Mario Constella (MoA), OFF spokesman on Defence: It's all about deterrence. The attacking nation should have taken notice that our nation will be using every means to defend our lands. That fact might ensure that a nation will not attack. So, probably and hopefully, we will never have to make use of this kind of weapons.Thank you. |
| Date | 08:41:44, January 18, 2020 CET | From | Partito Riformista Istaliano 🍀 | To | Debating the P.d.I.4/4696. Military Doctrine Act |
| Message | Leonardo De Giuliani, PRI Leader: While we support articles 1 and 2, we can’t support the last article. We’ll propose a similar bill without article 3. |
| Date | 12:11:38, January 18, 2020 CET | From | Alleanza Popolare | To | Debating the P.d.I.4/4696. Military Doctrine Act |
| Message | Members of the National Assembly, We support both article 1 and 2, but however do not think article 3 is appropriate, therefore we will abstain. Romero Geraci Leader of the Populists Member of the National Assembly |
| Date | 22:22:18, January 18, 2020 CET | From | Alleanza Popolare | To | Debating the P.d.I.4/4696. Military Doctrine Act |
| Message | Members of the Assembly, Circumstances have now changed and we take back our statement of abstaining on this bill and will instead choose to vote in favor of it. Thank you. Romero Geraci Leader of the Populists Member of the National Assembly |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 284 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 397 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: The Real-Life Equivalents Index is a valuable resource for finding out the in-game equivalents of real-life cultures, languages, religions, people and places: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6731 |
| Random quote: "If a female president can come here and be treated equally, why can't any other woman?" - Jewell C. Stillman, former Lourennais politician (on equal rights in Badara) |