We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: RPL - Pro Life Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Traditional Party of Rutania
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 4700
Description[?]:
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Policy on the legality of abortions
Old value:: Abortion is allowed during the first and second trimesters.
Current: Abortion is allowed during the first and second trimesters.
Proposed: All abortions are illegal.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Policy of the government concerning the funding of abortions
Old value:: The government leaves the funding for abortions up to the local governments.
Current: The government provides funding for abortions.
Proposed: The government does not provide funding for abortions.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 20:44:00, January 22, 2020 CET | From | Most Noble Order of Stag | To | Debating the RPL - Pro Life Bill |
| Message | Mrs Deputy Speaker, i would first like to thank you for allowing me the time to raise this point on the following bills regardless of the fact they have been sent to votes: July 4699 Religion Changes Bill July 4699 RPL - Pro Life Bill July 4699 RPL - Religion Changes August 4699 RPL - Moral Law Changes these have bee sent to vote with 0 debate. the government takes the stance that all legislation appart from cabinet proposals and early election proposals are debated which these preposals have not, we will be voting no until such a time that sufficiant debate has taken place. Signed Duke Jack Simms MP PC KGRC LLD DPm The Lord High Chancellor Secretary of State for the Constitution and Government Policy Leader of the Constitutional Solidarity Party Duke of Merton Senior Councillor to the Privy Council Knight Guardian of the Rutania Cross |
| Date | 23:38:50, January 22, 2020 CET | From | Traditional Party of Rutania | To | Debating the RPL - Pro Life Bill |
| Message | Mrs Deputy Speaker, I would like to express my apologies for rushing this bill through. However we did not realise there was much to debate on saving innocent childs life. It is clear that there is only one party which will stand up for the unborn in this nation. Thank you Bishop Michael Holloway |
| Date | 03:20:03, January 25, 2020 CET | From | Social Egalitarian Party | To | Debating the RPL - Pro Life Bill |
| Message | The SEP is voting no on the basis there was no debate held. From what we see in the proposal, we would have liked to debate a compromise on Article 1 (for emergency situations); however, the TPR has not afforded us the opportunity. Capt. Adrianna Garnet SEP Rep. for Health. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 619 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 131 |
| Random fact: Characters are considered to be "owned" by the player who first mentioned or created them. In practice, players may share responsibility for role-playing a character, but ultimate authority rests with the owner. |
| Random quote: "Because democracy is not a spectator sport." - 2004 Democratic campaign slogan |