We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Rattled Princely Camarilla: Rejuvination of the Noblest
Details
Submitted by[?]: Prince-Republican League - New EAPP
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 4733
Description[?]:
Although the bill's clearly meant more as an unproductive pandering to their local aristocratic base, the assorted Southern MPs still hanging about the Chamber of People's Deputies have still given their best to make a show out of the inevitable failure of its launch. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Titles of nobility.
Old value:: Titles of nobility are not granted, but their use is not forbidden.
Current: No titles of nobility are granted or recognised, their use is forbidden.
Proposed: Titles of nobility may be granted only by the nation's religious leaders.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Privileges of nobility (if nobility is recognised by the government).
Old value:: Nobility confers only titles and certain minor rights, but no political powers, and is not hereditary.
Current: Nobility confers titles and minor political rights, but no direct control over people or land, and can be hereditary.
Proposed: Nobility confers major rights, and can be hereditary.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Government policy concerning granting citizenship.
Old value:: Citizenship is gained by passing a qualifying exam.
Current: Citizenship is granted to all nationals.
Proposed: Citizenship is granted only to landowners.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change Appointment of military officers
Old value:: The Ministry of Defense is authorized to appoint military officers.
Current: The Ministry of Defense is authorized to appoint military officers.
Proposed: Only members of the nobility can be appointed to military officer positions.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 23:08:30, March 26, 2020 CET | From | Grand Nationalist Fraction | To | Debating the Rattled Princely Camarilla: Rejuvination of the Noblest |
Message | Mr. Speaker, in our opinion, this is a setback and therefore we cannot support this. Oliver Stratford Minister of Defence |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 220 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 525 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: You can view who's online (i.e. been active the last 10 minutes) at the bottom of the menu (either at the top or the side). |
Random quote: As for rape, of course, that is a direct consequence of the capitalist system of oppression. Capitalism relies on fuelling division and resentment to sustain itself, and so it sets men against women, race against race and so on. Men rape women because they are being oppressed by capitalism, so they take it out on women. Under Communism, there will be no rape, because there will be a full and natural harmony and equality between the genders. ~ Friedrich Pfeiffer General Secretary of the Dorvish Communist Party |