Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 00:16:45
Server time: 19:43:14, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): itsmenotme | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Civil liberties Reform of 2213

Details

Submitted by[?]: One Nation Socialist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2218

Description[?]:

Allowing our citizens greater freedoms.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date20:35:24, April 10, 2006 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the Civil liberties Reform of 2213
Message1 we oppose and 2 we can support.

Date01:19:13, April 11, 2006 CET
FromGreenish Liberal Democratic Socialists
ToDebating the Civil liberties Reform of 2213
Message1 we support and 2 we will oppose.
art 1: We support, that's our leftist-liberal nature.. but I don't think you'll find a majority for this.
art 2: We oppose, mainly because we think regulations are needed; a minimum age to buy guns, keeping guns outside the reach of children,... things like that



Date10:54:19, April 11, 2006 CET
FromSocial-Conservative party
ToDebating the Civil liberties Reform of 2213
MessageArticle 1: It is not a matter of that everyone should have the right to adopt, it is a matter that every child chould have the opportunity to haev a mother and a father. It is the rights of the child that goes first, not homosexuals whom desires to have children, and so in many genres. It is the Rights of the CHild we should care for, not for everyone to "have a child".

Article 2: we oppose most strongly, this would create a uncertain, unsecure world where everyone could have a weapon more or less. You do not need to be a mental deranged person or criminal to commit murder, it is easy, all you have to do is to pull the trigger in anger. And as the GLDS says, the same applies for children.

We oppose both articles

Date12:59:46, April 11, 2006 CET
FromAtlas
ToDebating the Civil liberties Reform of 2213
MessageArticle 1 : having a father and a mother or having a duck and a god is secondary. The essence is kids need food and shelter, caring parents, room to develop, a good school, an open society. There is no scientific proof or any supporting statistics for the hypothesis that two heterosexuals parents are better for kids than two homosexuals. We support.
Article 2 : firearms can cause irreversible harm, accidents happen quite oftenly, we believe we better stick to the strict regulation.

Date13:01:39, April 11, 2006 CET
FromAtlas
ToDebating the Civil liberties Reform of 2213
MessageHowever we wonder if article 1 would allow singles to adopt children ?

Date13:52:47, April 11, 2006 CET
FromOne Nation Socialist Party
ToDebating the Civil liberties Reform of 2213
Messageeveryone.

Date22:45:50, April 19, 2006 CET
FromOne Nation Socialist Party
ToDebating the Civil liberties Reform of 2213
Messagewe shall split the bils up.

Date22:27:57, April 20, 2006 CET
FromAtlas
ToDebating the Civil liberties Reform of 2213
MessageIf singles are allowed to adopt, we oppose. We feel one parent families are too closed and too vulnerable.

Date23:22:06, April 23, 2006 CET
FromOne Nation Socialist Party
ToDebating the Civil liberties Reform of 2213
MessageGLDS you said you promised support.

Date13:41:00, April 25, 2006 CET
FromGreenish Liberal Democratic Socialists
ToDebating the Civil liberties Reform of 2213
Messageapparantly we did.. sorry 'bout the mistake

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 149

no
    

Total Seats: 350

abstain
  

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: It usually takes up to an hour for election results to generate. During this time, the "Next Election" date is put forward a month, which is confusing. Do not worry! In a short time, the election result will generate and the "Next Election" date will then correct itself.

Random quote: "One day our descendants will think it incredible that we paid so much attention to things like the amount of melanin in our skin or the shape of our eyes or our gender instead of the unique identities of each of us as complex human beings." - Franklin Thomas

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 71