We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Kregon’s Vision Act, Chapter I: Religion
Details
Submitted by[?]: Regionalist Party of Kregon
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 4736
Description[?]:
These coming legislative proposals are firstly to create a manifesto for RPK, and secondly to find agreement between parties to come together for any of the proposed policy changes we are putting forth. The first chapter of Kregon’s vision dives directly into the remaining religious policies in action today which span from kneecapping religious organizations to lack of protection of the integrity of religions to unfair and unnecessary regulation of religious schools compared to state funded public schools. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change State penalties for blasphemy
Old value:: No state penalties are issued for blasphemy.
Current: No state penalties are issued for blasphemy.
Proposed: Public blasphemy is considered a minor offense.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change
Taxation of religious institutions.
Old value:: Religions are treated as companies, and all profit is taxed, however, charitable donations are not taxed.
Current: Religions are treated as companies, and all profit is taxed, however, charitable donations are not taxed.
Proposed: No religions are taxed.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The governments stance on religious schools.
Old value:: Religious schools are allowed, but are strictly regulated. Only recognised religions may set up religious schools.
Current: Only recognised religions may set up religious schools, with no regulations.
Proposed: Only recognised religions may set up religious schools, with no regulations.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 06:03:06, April 02, 2020 CET | From | Liberty Party | To | Debating the Kregon’s Vision Act, Chapter I: Religion |
Message | Mr. Speaker, We find articles 1 and 3 to be unacceptable, as these violate our core principles of individual liberties and a reduction of government meddling in our citizens’ lives. Article 2 can be considered further, and we could find ourselves voting either abstention or in favor depending on how the law is implemented. But as a whole this bill is considered unacceptable. Milan Grbić Liberty Party MP |
Date | 16:51:15, April 02, 2020 CET | From | Prince-Republican League - New EAPP | To | Debating the Kregon’s Vision Act, Chapter I: Religion |
Message | Mr. Speaker, We cannot for the life of us understand why any party claiming to be acting in the interests of the Kregonian people would not focus on the few most crucial issues for the Southern society, that is, the restoration of the legitimate Princely rule in Daro, the reabolition of urbanite-capitalist private automobile policies and defence of old Transkregonian high nobility. Are they even loyal to His Serene Augustness? Or are they just plants of the parliamentary rebel government in Daro? Theophile Julius von Baer-Gröönberg, democratically elected LTG's peace delegate in Daro |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 399 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 200 |
Random fact: Particracy has 464 player slots. |
Random quote: "The only difference between the Republican and Democratic parties is the velocities with which their knees hit the floor when corporations knock on their door. That's the only difference." - Ralph Nader |