We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: SD-SWP Government Program
Details
Submitted by[?]: Democratic Party of Likatonia
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 4736
Description[?]:
1) Giving more rights to the workers
2) Continue with progressive policy
3) Minimising influence of church |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:46:18, April 02, 2020 CET |
From | Conservative Republican Party | To | Debating the SD-SWP Government Program | | Message | Well let me just start of with,
The government has no place in religion and trying to reduce it is wrong
Getting back in the World Congress does not mean its okay to reduce our military, and personally I I have worked a lot on upgrading our military and actually getting it to a fighting force, its seem like your going to throw 30 IG years of work down the drain
You are the only Party that wants paramilitaries band
|
| Date | 23:55:25, April 02, 2020 CET |
From | Democratic Party of Likatonia | To | Debating the SD-SWP Government Program | | Message | Well I must be transparent with you and my intentions, if CRP holds majority and SWP or NULP presidency wouldn't your try to ban paramilitaries. Paramilitaries are non-existant in most developed countries. Do you want civil war? |
| Date | 23:58:50, April 02, 2020 CET |
From | Conservative Republican Party | To | Debating the SD-SWP Government Program | | Message | No I wouldn't, I would regulate them, I have CAFL with LAB, we can fight. Contrary to popular belief and most parties we don't change our views and values when someone else is in power, you may claim you and LAB are the only democratic parties, but I can say without a doubt I am the only one who sticks to my values no matter what. A house without a solid foundation will not stand, just like a party with no values will not succeed in the end. |
| Date | 00:00:32, April 03, 2020 CET |
From | Conservative Republican Party | To | Debating the SD-SWP Government Program | | Message | We mad programs like: LAP, started sub and Battleship programs, did it completely transparently, through the forum through the newspaper. You are thinking about fascist. |
| Date | 00:27:23, April 03, 2020 CET |
From | Likatonia First | To | Debating the SD-SWP Government Program | | Message | Parties shouldn't just stick to their values. A partys aim should be to get into power and do anything to do that. Anyway IRL partys change there veiwws a lot of the time to modernise and getinto power. |
| Date | 00:32:04, April 03, 2020 CET |
From | Conservative Republican Party | To | Debating the SD-SWP Government Program | | Message | Yes they should, they can change slightly, are you even lisenting to yourself?! Your are saying that parties should do anything to get into power, not represent their constituents as thats clearly way to radical, so much for democracy. |
| Date | 00:51:10, April 03, 2020 CET |
From | Likatonia First | To | Debating the SD-SWP Government Program | | Message | Well they have to win over the public by the new policies they come up with, anyway doing what gets them into power is doing what the public wants as they public gets them into power. Anyway there are enough seats for a different party to represent the views of the people in a certian state. |
| Date | 02:12:46, April 03, 2020 CET |
From | Conservative Republican Party | To | Debating the SD-SWP Government Program | | Message | Yes, but they can come up with new lans without abandoning their values, their is a difference between moderation and abandoning your values. Sadly you are choosing the later rather than the former. |
| Date | 18:44:12, April 03, 2020 CET |
From | Conservative Republican Party | To | Debating the SD-SWP Government Program | | Message | I am not saying you can't change policies, but when you do they shouldn't go to far from your base values, like I said moderation and values are different. For example my parties VALUES are pro-life unless the mothers life is at risk, but are POLICY is that we are willing to compromise at first trimester. |
| Date | 12:22:15, April 04, 2020 CET |
From | Democratic Party of Likatonia | To | Debating the SD-SWP Government Program | | Message | OOC: It's the same as the Labour Party in UK. They have just changed leadership and tried to rebrand the party. Typical example of how parties are searching for popularity in my oponion |
| Date | 13:22:52, April 04, 2020 CET |
From | Likatonia First | To | Debating the SD-SWP Government Program | | Message | I will vote in favour as parties which support a government also vote for their program (not much time to implement it though) |
subscribe to this discussion -
unsubscribeVoting
| Vote |
Seats |
| yes | Total Seats: 51 |
| no | Total Seats: 49 |
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar). |
| Random quote: "What we are doing to the forests of the world is but a mirror reflection of what we are doing to ourselves and to one another." - Gandhi |