We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ruthlessly Socialist Cabinet Proposal of February 2066
Details
Submitted by[?]: First Socialist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2067
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Ruthlessly Socialist Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the 
First Socialist Party
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the First Socialist Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the First Socialist Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the First Socialist Party
Article 5
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Ruthlessly Random Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Ruthlessly Random Party
Article 7
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the First Socialist Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Ruthlessly Random Party
Article 9
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Ruthlessly Random Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Christian Liberal Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 06:56:52, June 14, 2005 CET | From | First Socialist Party | To | Debating the Ruthlessly Socialist Cabinet Proposal of February 2066 |
| Message | We believe the fewer parties in a cabinet the better the cooperation. We also thing that the Christian Liberal Party are ideal with the Education ministry. With the Liberal Canucks missing in action, this cabinet represents over 57% of the government. |
| Date | 07:59:51, June 14, 2005 CET | From | Kellarly Party | To | Debating the Ruthlessly Socialist Cabinet Proposal of February 2066 |
| Message | Fair enough. |
| Date | 11:00:18, June 14, 2005 CET | From | Christian Liberal Party | To | Debating the Ruthlessly Socialist Cabinet Proposal of February 2066 |
| Message | Okay. |
| Date | 22:32:20, June 14, 2005 CET | From | Ruthlessly Random Party | To | Debating the Ruthlessly Socialist Cabinet Proposal of February 2066 |
| Message | How could I object? |
| Date | 04:25:48, June 15, 2005 CET | From | Federal Technocrats | To | Debating the Ruthlessly Socialist Cabinet Proposal of February 2066 |
| Message | We believe that greater sharing of the power is far more benefitial for a truly democratic society, and this form of cooperational 'efficiency' only serves to narrow national viewpoint. As such we cannot conciously support this bill. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 104 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 11 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 68 |
| Random fact: Role-play is most enjoyable and successful when there is good communication and friendly relations between all players involved. |
| Random quote: "The communist revolution is the most radical rupture with traditional property relations; no wonder that its development involves the most radical rupture with traditional ideas." - Karl Marx |