Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 01:07:59
Server time: 18:52:00, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Mindus | VojmatDunDSU | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Nuclear Power Act (NPA)

Details

Submitted by[?]: Classical Liberal Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 2214

Description[?]:

This bill realizes the potential of nuclear power as an energy source without forcing areas to have them.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:26:33, April 15, 2006 CET
FromLutte Féministe de Libération
ToDebating the Nuclear Power Act (NPA)
MessageAren't you intervening in the free market, hypocrite? You won't subsidize housing, but you'll subsidise corporations looking to poison our Earth with the nuclear scourge?

Date01:50:35, April 15, 2006 CET
FromClassical Liberal Party
ToDebating the Nuclear Power Act (NPA)
MessageWell frankly I was thinking more of giving tax benefits to regions which let the nuclear power plants go into their area. It was that or I mandate what the power plants are which would go against letting the market be privataized. So watch who your calling a hypocrite LDP. Your the one who can't win votes so you have to turn christian to try to salvage your dying party.

Date02:54:59, April 15, 2006 CET
FromLutte Féministe de Libération
ToDebating the Nuclear Power Act (NPA)
Message"Proposed: The government encourages nuclear power (subsidies, tax relief etc)"

This would seem to suggest you are offering subsidies and tax relief to companies that open up nuclear power plants.

Date07:13:25, April 15, 2006 CET
FromClassical Liberal Party
ToDebating the Nuclear Power Act (NPA)
MessageSadly with the privitization aspect now that would be what was happening or I'd be choosing a bill that mandates what type of energy plants those companies had to use. I picked the lesser of two evils and went with the one without coercion.

Date10:20:24, April 15, 2006 CET
FromDevout Ecologists Party
ToDebating the Nuclear Power Act (NPA)
MessageIt still means you are undermining a free market.

We oppose nuclear energy since we have better alternatives. We live in 2213, and nuclear power is of the past. Many other methods have been invented which do not have any waste what so ever, and are better for the environment. Energy produced in naturefriendly ways provide us with enough power, are not centralised to nuclear power plants and are thus able to put everywhere it is needed. When the grid is not as centralised as it is with nuclear power plants, one is less dependant on such a plant, and thus safer from the power coming down.
The waste is hazardoes to the environment for centuries, and there is not a way to dispose of them in a short time. The radiation has to wear off over centuries and waste only becomes more with the use of nuclear energy. Why use such a method when you can use energy produced by nature itself without hazardous consequences and which are an infinite power source?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 367

no
  

Total Seats: 165

abstain
  

Total Seats: 68


Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining.

Random quote: "In our age, there is no such thing as 'keeping out of politics.' All issues are political issues, and politics itself is a mass of lies, evasions, folly, hatred and schizophrenia." - George Orwell

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 56